Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reassessing the Variables Used to Measure Public Perceptions of Scientists

16 references·16 citing·50 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1994The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing22,337 cited
1995An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust15,026 cited
2011The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–20102,337 cited
2012The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks2,292 cited
1992Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science1,673 cited
1999Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement1,232 cited
2007What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda769 cited
1991Credibility and trust in risk communication731 cited
2010Public Relations Theory II694 cited
2011Justice, Trust, and Trustworthiness: A Longitudinal Analysis Integrating Three Theoretical Perspectives646 cited
1981Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades569 cited
2007The Polls Trends: Twenty Years of Public Opinion about Global Warming508 cited
2014Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics498 cited
2013An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming461 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2015Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI)372 cited

2016Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement328 cited

Cited by

2022Predicting Public Trust in Science: The Role of Basic Orientations Toward Science, Perceived Trustworthiness of Scientists, and Experiences With Science99 cited
2019The Polls—Trends91 cited
2024Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries83 cited
2022Establishing Trust in Experts During a Crisis: Expert Trustworthiness and Media Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic73 cited
2020Science public relations: The parallel, interwoven, and contrasting trajectories of public relations and science communication theory and practice61 cited
2021How representative surveys measure public (dis)trust in science: A systematisation and analysis of survey items and open-ended questions46 cited
2024The Public Trust in Science Scale: A Multilevel and Multidimensional Approach33 cited
2021The role of communication professionals in fostering a culture of public engagement22 cited
2021Follow the scientists? How beliefs about the practice of science shaped COVID-19 views22 cited
2021American Scientists’ Willingness to Use Different Communication Tactics21 cited
2023Prolific non-research authors in high impact scientific journals: meta-research study21 cited
2024‘Follow the science’: Popular trust in scientific experts during the coronavirus pandemic19 cited
2021Scientists, presidents, and pandemics—comparing the science–politics nexus during the Zika virus and COVID‐19 outbreaks16 cited
2023Officially social: Developing a social media crisis communication strategy for USGS Volcanoes during the 2018 Kīlauea eruption15 cited
2023Improving media trust research through better measurement: An item response theory perspective14 cited
2024When Social Media Attack: How Exposure to Political Attacks on Social Media Promotes Anger and Political Cynicism14 cited