SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating Likelihood Ratio (LR) for firearm evidence identifications in forensic science based on the Congruent Matching Cells (CMC) method
10 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Evaluating Likelihood Ratio (LR) for firearm evidence identifications in forensic science based on the Congruent Matching Cells (CMC) method (2020)Evaluating Likelihood Ratio (LR) for fire…Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners (2019)Validity and reliability of f…A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation (2016)A guideline for the validatio…ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science (2015)ENFSI guideline for evaluativ…Automatic Comparison and Evaluation of Impressions Left by a Firearm on Fired Cartridge Cases (2014)Automatic Comparison and Eval…Confocal Microscopy Analysis of Breech Face Marks on Fired Cartridge Cases from 10 Consecutively Manufactured Pistol Slides* (2012)Confocal Microscopy Analysis …The National Ballistics Imaging Comparison (NBIC) project (2011)The National Ballistics Imagi…Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings (2010)Fundamentals of probability a…Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Scienc…Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening forensic scienc…SRM 2460/2461 standard bullets and casings project (2004)SRM 2460/2461 standard bullet…Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995)The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. (1995)Improve statistics in court (2011)E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: Report on experiences from current projects and outlook (2012)Liberties and constraints of the normative approach to evaluation and decision in forensic science: a discussion towards overcoming some common misconceptions (2014)Quality Systems—Medical Devices—Particular Requirements for the Application of ISO 9001 (2004)General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories (2005)Pilot Study of Automated Bullet Signature Identification Based on Topography Measurements and Correlations*† (2010)Nanotechnology for forensic sciences: Analysis of PDMS replica of the case head of spent cartridges by optical microscopy, SEM and AFM for the ballistic identification of individual characteristic features of firearms (2012)Consecutive Matching Striation Criteria: A General Critique (2000)Defending the Scientific Foundations of the Firearms and Tool Mark Identification Discipline: Responding to Recent Challenges (2007)Comparison and interpretation of impressed marks left by a firearm on cartridge cases – Towards an operational implementation of a likelihood ratio based technique (2020)Firearm examination: Examiner judgments and computer‐based comparisons (2020)Inconclusives, Errors, and Error Rates in Forensic Firearms Analysis:Three Statistical Perspectives (2022)Preventing miscarriages of justice: A review of forensic firearm identification (2015)Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results (2018)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)A model for case assessment and interpretation (1998)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Toward Locard’s Exchange Principle: Recent Developments in Forensic Trace Evidence Analysis (2018)Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science (2022)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. (1993)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)The Error in ‘Error Rate’: Why Error Rates Are So Needed, Yet So Elusive (2020)Treatment of inconclusives in the AFTE range of conclusions (2020)Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners (2022)Development and Validation of a Virtual Examination Tool for Firearm Forensics, , (2017)Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners (2022)Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings (2016)Reframing the Debate: A Question of Probability, Not of Likelihood Ratio (2016)Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis (2019)The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
  • 2009Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward957 cited
  • 2015ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science179 cited
  • 2016A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation153 cited
  • 2014Automatic Comparison and Evaluation of Impressions Left by a Firearm on Fired Cartridge Cases55 cited
  • 2019Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners53 cited
  • 2012Confocal Microscopy Analysis of Breech Face Marks on Fired Cartridge Cases from 10 Consecutively Manufactured Pistol Slides*40 cited
  • 2010Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings39 cited
  • 2004SRM 2460/2461 standard bullets and casings project34 cited
  • 2011The National Ballistics Imaging Comparison (NBIC) project13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work