Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why Participate in Peer Review?

3 references·11 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
2000Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial274 cited
2010Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial163 cited

Cited by

2023Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals24 cited
2023Los desafíos de la revisión por pares: cómo garantizar la calidad y transparencia del proceso editorial de las revistas científicas22 cited
2021Now More Than Ever: Reflections on the State and Importance of Peer Review21 cited
2022Towards improving peer review: Crowd-sourced insights from Twitter14 cited
2023Gender imbalances in the editorial activities of a selective journal run by academic editors14 cited
2022Towards improving peer review: Crowd-sourced insights from Twitter8 cited
2023The Ideal Review Process Is a Three-Way Street7 cited
2024Engagement of early career researchers in collaborative assessments of IPCC reports: achievements and insights7 cited
2024The Peer Review Process6 cited
2023Peer review in scientific publishing: Current practice, guidelines, relevancy, and way forward6 cited
2023

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Peer review: Problematic or promising?

3 cited