References

• 1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
• 2018The Matthew effect in science funding636 cited
• 2019Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists629 cited
• 2019Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency570 cited
• 2014Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women426 cited
• 2006The art of getting funded: how scientists adapt to their funding conditions286 cited
• 2012Foreign-born scientists: mobility patterns for 16 countries215 cited
• 2018Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications210 cited
• 2019Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article186 cited
• 2021Racial inequity in grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health185 cited
• 2019On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective184 cited
• 2016Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery162 cited
• 2018Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada151 cited
• 2014Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding147 cited