SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to bring peer review ghostwriters out of the dark
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
How to bring peer review ghostwriters out of the dark (2021)How to bring peer review ghostwriters out…Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals (2021)Gender gap in journal submiss…Royal Society of Chemistry (2020)Royal Society of ChemistryPeer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals (2020)Peer review and preprint poli…No Tickets for Women in the COVID-19 Race? A Study on Manuscript Submissions and Reviews in 2347 Elsevier Journals during the Pandemic (2020)No Tickets for Women in the C…Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review (2020)Journal policies and editors’…Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts (2019)Co-reviewing and ghostwriting…Publish peer reviews (2018)Publish peer reviewsThe Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)The Global Burden of Journal …Decoupling of the minority PhD talent pool and assistant professor hiring in medical school basic science departments in the US (2016)Decoupling of the minority Ph…Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)Peer Review in Scientific Pub…Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial (2012)Does mentoring new peer revie…The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality (2007)The Relationship of Previous …What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)What Makes a Good Reviewer an…Chronicle of Higher Education (1996)Chronicle of Higher EducationThe characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews (1993)The characteristics of peer r…Reviewer Status and Review Quality (1985)Reviewer Status and Review Qu…Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions (2001)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews (2016)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1986)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)Teaching and physics education research: bridging the gap (2014)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial (2000)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)Meta-research: Why research on research matters (2018)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)Science and Engineering Indicators 1998 (1998)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards (2011)The Influence of Affirming Kindness and Community on Broadening Participation in STEM Career Pathways (2018)Nudging Toward Diversity: Applying Behavioral Design to Faculty Hiring (2020)Patching the Leaks: Revitalizing and Reimagining the STEM Pipeline (2020)The history of the peer-review process (2002)Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Superiority of external attentional focus for motor performance and learning: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (2021)Toward a sustainability organizational culture model (2023)Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial (2010)Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers (2017)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences (2019)Signaling the trustworthiness of science (2019)Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review (2022)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Redefine statistical significance (2017)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Gendering excellence through research productivity indicators (2022)The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive (2022)How covid-19 bolstered an already perverse publishing system (2023)Chemical datuments as scientific enablers (2013)Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research (1995)Implementing Service Learning in Higher Education (1996)Executive Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Chronicle of Higher Education3,019 cited
  • 2014Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.399 cited
  • 1998What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?266 cited
  • 2016The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise246 cited
  • 2021Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals227 cited
  • 2016Decoupling of the minority PhD talent pool and assistant professor hiring in medical school basic science departments in the US172 cited
  • 1993The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews150 cited
  • 2007The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality139 cited
  • 2020Royal Society of Chemistry125 cited
  • 2018Publish peer reviews90 cited
  • 2020Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals89 cited
  • 2012Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial89 cited
  • 2020No Tickets for Women in the COVID-19 Race? A Study on Manuscript Submissions and Reviews in 2347 Elsevier Journals during the Pandemic84 cited
  • 2020Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

73 cited
  • 2019Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts66 cited
  • 1985Reviewer Status and Review Quality66 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.