SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The gender gap in highly prestigious international research awards, 2001–2020
16 references·15 citing·39 second hop
The gender gap in highly prestigious international research awards, 2001–2020 (2021)The gender gap in highly prestigious inte…Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)Historical comparison of gend…The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? (2018)The gender gap in science: Ho…Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? (2016)Why are some STEM fields more…Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions (2016)Gender Gap in Science, Techno…Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines (2015)Expectations of brilliance un…Women in Academic Science (2014)Women in Academic ScienceInternet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys (2014)Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mi…How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science (2014)How stereotypes impair women’…Matthew: Effect or Fable? (2013)Matthew: Effect or Fable?Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Bibliometrics: Global gender …The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s (2012)The Matilda Effect in science…Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Understanding current causes …Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2008)Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mod…Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? (2005)Women and science careers: le…The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceThink star, think men? Implicit star performer theories (2024)Think star, think men? Implic…International mobility matters: Research collaboration and scientific productivity (2024)International mobility matter…Impact of gender composition of academic teams on disruptive output (2024)Impact of gender composition …Female-dominated disciplines have lower evaluated research quality and funding success rates, for men and women (2024)Female-dominated disciplines …A matter of time? Gender and ethnic inequality in the academic publishing careers of Dutch Ph.D.s (2024)A matter of time? Gender and …Women and non-white people among Lasker Award recipients from 1946 to 2022: cross sectional study (2023)Women and non-white people am…Quantifying gender imbalance in East Asian academia: Research career and citation practice (2023)Quantifying gender imbalance …Little transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution (2023)Little transparency and equit…Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration (2023)Exploring Gender Bias in Six …Do bibliometrics introduce gender, institutional or interdisciplinary biases into research evaluations? (2023)Do bibliometrics introduce ge…Breaking through the glass ceiling: unveiling women’s representation by gender and race in the higher education hierarchy (2023)Breaking through the glass ce…Metrics and epistemic injustice (2022)Metrics and epistemic injusti…Gender gap among highly cited researchers, 2014–2021 (2022)Gender gap among highly cited…Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2022)Gender and country biases in …Career Progression and Research Productivity of Women in Academic Cardiothoracic Surgery (2022)Career Progression and Resear…Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Reflections on Gender and Science (1987)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)Why Students Choose STEM Majors (2013)Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists (2020)Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences (2006)Science of science (2018)Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health (2019)Sex Differences in Mental Test Scores, Variability, and Numbers of High-Scoring Individuals (1995)Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation (2000)Gender Stereotypes (2017)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (2009)Why so Few Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (2010)Gender Similarities and Differences (2013)The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (2018)Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention (2007)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Digest of Education Statistics (2014)The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017 (2017)Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM (2018)Gender Diversity in STEM Disciplines: A Multiple Factor Problem (2019)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance (1994)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls (2017)How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates (2019)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Selection Bias in Web Surveys (2010)Identifying careless responses in survey data. (2012)Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87 (2014)Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis (2014)A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge? (2018)Web Versus Other Survey Modes: An Updated and Extended Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
  • 2008Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method5,336 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 2014Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys4,513 cited
  • 2005Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?1,746 cited
  • 2015Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines1,514 cited
  • 2013Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science1,496 cited
  • 2016Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?1,256 cited
  • 2016Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions1,193 cited
  • 2011Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science1,116 cited
  • 2014Women in Academic Science1,020 cited
  • 2020Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines957 cited
  • 2014How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science831 cited
  • 2018The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?770 cited
  • 2012

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s
363 cited
  • 2013Matthew: Effect or Fable?337 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration140 cited
    • 2023Do bibliometrics introduce gender, institutional or interdisciplinary biases into research evaluations?33 cited
    • 2024International mobility matters: Research collaboration and scientific productivity26 cited
    • 2023Quantifying gender imbalance in East Asian academia: Research career and citation practice22 cited
    • 2024Impact of gender composition of academic teams on disruptive output22 cited
    • 2022Gender gap among highly cited researchers, 2014–202121 cited
    • 2022Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications21 cited
    • 2022Career Progression and Research Productivity of Women in Academic Cardiothoracic Surgery19 cited
    • 2022Metrics and epistemic injustice17 cited
    • 2023Women and non-white people among Lasker Award recipients from 1946 to 2022: cross sectional study17 cited
    • 2023Breaking through the glass ceiling: unveiling women’s representation by gender and race in the higher education hierarchy17 cited
    • 2024Think star, think men? Implicit star performer theories16 cited
    • 2024A matter of time? Gender and ethnic inequality in the academic publishing careers of Dutch Ph.D.s15 cited
    • 2023Little transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution14 cited
    • 2024Female-dominated disciplines have lower evaluated research quality and funding success rates, for men and women9 cited