SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do longitudinal orthodontic trials use appropriate statistical analyses? A meta-epidemiological study
11 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Do longitudinal orthodontic trials use appropriate statistical analyses? A meta-epidemiological study (2021)Do longitudinal orthodontic trials use ap…Dental Research Waste in Design, Analysis, and Reporting: A Scoping Review (2020)Dental Research Waste in Desi…Publication pattern, study design, authors and countries involved in orthodontic RCTs – a bibliometric MEDLINE survey over the past 50 years (2019)Publication pattern, study de…Methods, transparency and reporting of clinical trials in orthodontics and periodontics (2019)Methods, transparency and rep…Statistical testing against baseline in orthodontic research: a meta-epidemiologic study (2018)Statistical testing against b…Statistical testing against baseline was common in dental research (2015)Statistical testing against b…Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines (2014)Basic statistical reporting f…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals? (2012)Are clustering effects accoun…Reporting of Research Quality Characteristics of Studies Published in 6 Major Clinical Dental Specialty Journals (2011)Reporting of Research Quality…Does published orthodontic research account for clustering effects during statistical data analysis? (2011)Does published orthodontic re…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Publication bias in randomized controlled trials in dentistry. What factors affect statistical significance of outcomes? (2022)Pay attention to the analysis: Common statistical errors in orthodontic randomised clinical trials (2024)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations (2015)Reporting of clinical trials in the orthodontic literature from 2008 to 2012: observational study of published reports in four major journals (2015)Quality assessment of randomised controlled trials in oral and maxillofacial surgery (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: A longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties (2018)Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology (2018)Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines (2021)Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1969)The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes (2010)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The preregistration revolution (2018)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Randomized controlled trial: the gold standard or an unobtainable fallacy? (2015)Is orthodontic research falling prey to obscure and predatory journals? A bibliometric study (2024)The evolution of orthodontic literature through journals: a century of paradigm shifts, globalization, and digitalization (2025)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Transparency in clinical trials: Adding value to paediatric dental research (2020)Research transparency in dental research: A programmatic analysis (2022)Mapping of available health research and development data: what's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? (2013)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The presence and characteristics of ‘spin’ among randomized controlled trial abstracts in orthodontics (2021)Evaluating dental AI research papers: Key considerations for editors and reviewers (2025)The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews (2015)Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics (2018)The reporting quality of split-mouth trials in orthodontics according to CONSORT guidelines: 2015–19 (2020)Importance of Transparent Reporting of Health Research (2014)The CONSORT Statement: Application within and adaptations for orthodontic trials (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,995 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,136 cited
  • 2014Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines670 cited
  • 2012Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals?65 cited
  • 2020Dental Research Waste in Design, Analysis, and Reporting: A Scoping Review58 cited
  • 2011Does published orthodontic research account for clustering effects during statistical data analysis?43 cited
  • 2019Methods, transparency and reporting of clinical trials in orthodontics and periodontics40 cited
  • 2011Reporting of Research Quality Characteristics of Studies Published in 6 Major Clinical Dental Specialty Journals33 cited
  • 2015Statistical testing against baseline was common in dental research15 cited
  • 2019Publication pattern, study design, authors and countries involved in orthodontic RCTs – a bibliometric MEDLINE survey over the past 50 years11 cited
  • 2018Statistical testing against baseline in orthodontic research: a meta-epidemiologic study11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work