More than fun in the sun: The pedagogy of field trips improves student learning in higher education

Jabari C. Jones · Susan E. Washko

60 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Geoscience Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Geography Education and Pedagogy Science Education and Pedagogy Outdoor and Experiential Education

Abstract

Field experiences are a fundamental and well-loved tool for teaching in the natural sciences. However, a number of concerns threaten continued incorporation of field experiences into courses, including increased class sizes, strained finances, legal liability, accessibility concerns, and the effects of COVID-19. Because of these barriers, it is critically important to investigate and articulate the value of field trips to better advocate for their continued implementation. By reviewing existing literature on traditional field trips and courses, virtual field experiences, and accessible field trips, we have identified several attributes that contribute to the value of field trips as a pedagogical tool. The strength of field activities lies in (1) the integration of active learning, (2) the co-creation of knowledge through collaborative, problem-based activities, (3) place-based learning that provides real-world context, and (4) rapid feedback between peers and instructors. These strategies are well-represented in scholarship on teaching and learning, and further, strategies implemented in field learning may help to reduce the achievement gap for underrepresented groups. Applying the four attributes of field trip pedagogy to classroom and virtual classroom activities, as well as to virtual field trips, can improve teaching and learning when field trips are not possible. Instructors should aim to re-create as many of these attributes as possible to design courses that are as impactful as those involving traditional field trips.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 60 citations exist upstream.

References

2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies 2009Developing the theory of formative assessment 1995From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education 2020Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math 2007Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions and Active Learning 2007“Is that paper really due today?”: differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations 1992Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the Lives of Minority Mathematics Students in College 2014Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?

Cited by

2023Comparison of in-person and virtual Grand Canyon undergraduate field trip learning outcomes 2024The value of field studies in earth and environmental sciences: A review 2025Determinants of Usefulness of Chat GPT for Learning in Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Using Information Credibility, Fun, and Responsiveness and Moderating Role of Fun 2023Welcome to the field: A survey on practices in introductory geoscience field skills in the USA

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.