SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open bibliographic data and the Italian National Scientific Qualification: Measuring coverage of academic fields
16 references·0 citing·24 second hopsampled
Open bibliographic data and the Italian National Scientific Qualification: Measuring coverage of academic fields (2022)Open bibliographic data and the Italian N…The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The journal coverage of Web o…Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Large-scale comparison of bib…Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity (2020)Web of Science as a data sour…Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-qua…Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough (2020)Microsoft Academic Graph: Whe…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data (2020)Dimensions: Bringing down bar…Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata (2020)Crossref: The sustainable sou…Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings (2020)Comparison of bibliographic d…Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science? (2019)Two new kids on the block: Ho…Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment (2019)Google Scholar as a Data Sour…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? (2018)Dimensions: A competitor to S…The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university (2017)The coverage of Microsoft Aca…The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns (2015)A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (2019)Distributional Structure (1954)2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (2013)CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (2020)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis6,284 cited
  • 2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies2,745 cited
  • 2021The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis2,539 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories2,343 cited
  • 2020Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity1,468 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations1,449 cited
  • 2021Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic1,106 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations916 cited
  • 2020Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough553 cited
  • 2018Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?339 cited
  • 2020Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data274 cited
  • 2020Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata186 cited
  • 2019Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

164 cited
  • 2019Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment143 cited
  • 2017The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university119 cited
  • 2020Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings108 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.