Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A modest proposal to the peer review process: a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach in the assessment of scholarly communication

9 references·1 citing·51 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited
2020European Science Editing148 cited
2006Peer Review in the Organizational and Management Sciences: Prevalence and Effects of Reviewer Hostility, Bias, and Dissensus134 cited
2012Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial89 cited
2014Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?38 cited
2016What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review38 cited
2020What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis31 cited
2019‘No comment’? A study of commenting on PLOS articles13 cited

Cited by

2025English native-speakerism in the phenomenon of reviewer 2: implications for qualitative research3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work