Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Sentencing Disparity and Sentencing Guidelines: the Case of China

12 references·1 citing·49 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1974Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change2,807 cited
1998THE INTERACTION OF RACE, GENDER, AND AGE IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING: THE PUNISHMENT COST OF BEING YOUNG, BLACK, AND MALE1,592 cited
2001Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts634 cited
2011Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research449 cited
1995The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing369 cited
2012Reassessing and Redirecting Research on Race and Sentencing357 cited
2008A meta-analysis of the effect of education on social capital326 cited
2009The Independent and Joint Effects of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Age on Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts321 cited
1987Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970220 cited
1975Sentencing Councils: A Study of Sentence Disparity and Its Reduction68 cited
1980“He Takes Some of My Time; I Take Some of His”: An Analysis of Judicial Sentencing Patterns in Jury Cases57 cited
2015Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales44 cited

Cited by

2023Health Fraud against the Elderly in China: The Perspective of Vulnerability Manipulation11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work