Working from home during COVID-19: A study of the interruption landscape.

Sophie Leroy · Aaron M. Schmidt · Nora Y. Madjar

145 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Work-Family Balance Challenges Personal Information Management and User Behavior Technostress in Professional Settings

Abstract

We examine how the shift toward intensive work-from-home during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the experience of interruptions during work time. We conducted a two-wave survey of 249 employees working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Building on a conceptual framework and typology (Leroy et al., 2020), we examine changes in the prevalence of interruptions since-COVID-19 as a function of interruption type (intrusions, distractions, breaks, multitasking, and surprises), source (work-based vs. nonwork), and timing (pre- vs. since-COVID-19). We find a large increase in interruptions since-COVID, with the largest increases observed for nonwork intrusions, distractions, and multitasking. Women reported a greater increase in interruptions, particularly with regard to nonwork interruptions of all types, in addition to work-based intrusions, multitasking, and surprises, uncovering an important source of gender inequity. A dedicated unshared workspace at home was associated with fewer nonwork interruptions, while more nonwork responsibilities predicted more nonwork interruptions. Further differentiation of interruption types and sources was observed with regard to outcomes of interruptions. Nonwork interruptions predicted higher family-to-work interference, emotional exhaustion, and lower performance. Notably, these relationships varied meaningfully across specific interruption-type/outcome combinations, highlighting the value of differentiating interruptions by type. Work-based interruptions-especially intrusions and multitasking-were associated with higher work-family interference and emotional exhaustion, as well as lower performance. The results of this study provide valuable insights to help understand and, ultimately, improve work experiences in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic while also contributing to the broader literatures on interruptions and remote work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 145 citations exist upstream.

References

2007The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences.2000All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions 2015How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings 2005Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness 1999The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time 1991Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis.2003Work Interrupted: A Closer Look at the Role of Interruptions in Organizational Life 2018Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.