SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Toward Criminal Jury Instructions That Jurors Can Understand
0 references·16 citing·43 second hopsampled
Toward Criminal Jury Instructions That Jurors Can Understand (1984)Toward Criminal Jury Instructions That Ju…Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors’ application of instructions. (2017)Deconstructing the simplifica…Redefining Trial by Media (2016)Redefining Trial by MediaObjective and Subjective Comprehension of Jury Instructions in Criminal Trials (2014)Objective and Subjective Comp…What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity (2011)What are we studying? Student…Deliberation Quality: A Preliminary Examination in Criminal Juries (2007)Deliberation Quality: A Preli…Improving comprehension of jury instructions with audio‐visual presentation (2004)Improving comprehension of ju…Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases: The role of declarative and procedural knowledge. (2004)Guided jury discretion in cap…Using a Flow-chart to Improve Comprehension of Jury Instructions (2002)Using a Flow-chart to Improve…Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example. (2001)Evaluating the comprehensibil…Precious little guidance: Jury instruction on damage awards. (2000)Precious little guidance: Jur…Legal ease and ‘Legalese’ (2000)Legal ease and ‘Legalese’A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions. (1997)A ceiling or consistency effe…Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. (1995)Comprehensibility of approved…Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges. (1993)Instructing on death: Psychol…Judge's Instruction on Eyewitness Testimony: Evaluation and Revision1 (1988)Judge's Instruction on Eyewit…When crimes are joined at trial. (1985)When crimes are joined at tri…Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)Inside the jury (1983)The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure (1985)The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. (2002)Victim Impact Testimony and Juror Judgments: The Effects of Harm Information and Witness Demeanor1 (2002)The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? (2005)Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. (1997)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant Treatment. (2005)The influence of defendant race and victim physical attractiveness on juror decision-making in a sexual assault trial (2014)Differences in expert witness knowledge: do mock jurors notice and does it matter? (2015)The impact of power and powerlessness on blaming the victim of sexual assault (2017)Evaluating witness evidence (1984)The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. (1984)The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony: A Comparison of Experts and Prospective Jurors (1992)Timing of Eyewitness Expert Testimony, Jurors' Need for Cognition, and Case Strength as Determinants of Trial Verdicts. (2004)A Teaching Aid for Improving Jurors' Assessments of Eyewitness Accuracy (2012)The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials (2007)Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them (2009)Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (2013)Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? (1977)Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions. (1989)Double discounting: The effects of comparative negligence on mock juror decision making. (1999)Instructing jurors on general damages in personal injury cases: Problems and possibilities. (2000)The gist of juries: Testing a model of damage award decision making. (2015)Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. (1992)Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections. (2000)Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidents (2000)Personality and Attitude Change: An Information-Processing Theory (1968)Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. (1980)Intoxicated But Not Incapacitated: Are There Effective Methods to Assist Juries in Interpreting Evidence of Voluntary Complainant Intoxication in Cases of Rape? (2018)Performing Expertise: The Design of Audiovisual Links and the Construction of the Remote Expert Witness in Court (2018)Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts (2025)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Social Cognition (1999)Social Cognition: Making Sense of People (2000)Disability and Aging Discrimination (2010)Dynamics in Document Design (1998)Professional Writing Expertise (2006)The psychology of interrogations and confessions (2013)The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language (2018)Financial reporting transparency, citizens' understanding, and public participation: A survey experiment study (2021)The Impact of Expert Testimony on Jurors' Decisions: Gender of the Expert and Testimony Complexity1 (2005)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1995Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases.84 cited
  • 1993Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges.67 cited
  • 1988Judge's Instruction on Eyewitness Testimony: Evaluation and Revision166 cited
  • 2001Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example.65 cited
  • 1997A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions.52 cited
  • 2011What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity52 cited
  • 2014Objective and Subjective Comprehension of Jury Instructions in Criminal Trials50 cited
  • 2004Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases: The role of declarative and procedural knowledge.46 cited
  • 2000Legal ease and ‘Legalese’42 cited
  • 2000Precious little guidance: Jury instruction on damage awards.42 cited
  • 2004Improving comprehension of jury instructions with audio‐visual presentation39 cited
  • 2007Deliberation Quality: A Preliminary Examination in Criminal Juries39 cited
  • 1985When crimes are joined at trial.39 cited
  • 2017Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors’ application of instructions.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

38 cited
  • 2016Redefining Trial by Media37 cited
  • 2002Using a Flow-chart to Improve Comprehension of Jury Instructions36 cited