SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions?
16 references·0 citing·54 second hop
Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions? (2021)Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the ef…Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Scientists rise up against st…Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking (2016)Degrees of Freedom in Plannin…Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters (2015)Random-effects meta-analysis:…Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change (2014)Random-Effects Meta-analysis …Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence? (2011)Is meta-analysis the platinum…Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (2011)Chapter 12: Interpreting resu…Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Meta-analysis of individual p…A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)A basic introduction to fixed…Interpreting Causality in the Health Sciences (2007)Interpreting Causality in the…Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned (2006)Adjustment of meta-analyses o…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis (2002)A comparison of summary patie…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Meta-analysis: Statistical alchemy for the 21st century (1995)Meta-analysis: Statistical al…Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Meta-analysis of the literatu…An exercise in mega-silliness. (1978)An exercise in mega-silliness.Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. (1977)THE EFFECTS OF PSYCHOTHERAPY (1980)Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses. (1985)The Efficacy of Early Intervention Programs: A Meta-Analysis (1986)Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? (1989)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders (1997)Excess mortality of mental disorder (1998)How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies (2015)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Causality and explanation (1998)Causality and Explanation (1998)On the Mode of the Communication of Cholera (2008)Mechanisms and the Evidence Hierarchy (2013)The New Mechanical Philosophy (2017)Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review (2020)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis (2013)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020)Using Numerical Results from Systematic Reviews in Clinical Practice (1997)A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis (2000)Communicating Statistical Information (2000)Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders (2014)Music therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (2014)Music therapy for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like disorders (2017)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research (2017)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Small Effects: The Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Science (2021)The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis6,786 cited
  • 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2010Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting1,701 cited
  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 2011Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions872 cited
  • 1993Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?769 cited
  • 2016Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking754 cited
  • 2007Interpreting Causality in the Health Sciences548 cited
  • 1978An exercise in mega-silliness.466 cited
  • 2014Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change452 cited
  • 2002A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis394 cited
  • 1995Meta-analysis: Statistical alchemy for the 21st century338 cited
  • 2006Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned207 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2015
Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters
198 cited
  • 2011Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?193 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.