Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evidential value of duct tape comparison using loopbreaking patterns

13 references·1 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2019Introduction to Probability Models247 cited
2015ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science179 cited
2011Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems165 cited
2016A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation153 cited
2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States132 cited
2013Reliable support: Measuring calibration of likelihood ratios126 cited
1997Estimation from Zero‐Failure Data56 cited
2018Building a unified statistical framework for the forensic identification of source problems51 cited
2006A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches*43 cited
2015The interpretation of traces found on adhesive tapes31 cited
2007Forensic Examination of Pressure Sensitive Tape27 cited
2012A Quantitative Analysis of Torn and Cut Duct Tape Physical End Matching22 cited
2019Development and validation of a systematic approach for the quantitative assessment of the quality of duct tape physical fits19 cited

Cited by

2023Forensic interlaboratory evaluations of a systematic method for examining, documenting, and interpreting duct tape physical fits9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work