SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Toward a Framework for Validating Gains Under High-Stakes Conditions · Study

DatasetShelves

DatasetToward a Framework for Validating Gains Under High-Stakes Conditions

Daniel M. Koretz2001

Dataset2001

Toward a Framework for Validating Gains Under High-Stakes Conditions

Daniel M. Koretz · Daniel F. McCaffrey · Laura S. Hamilton

49 citations·0/0 files stored·PsycEXTRA Dataset

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Educational Assessment and Pedagogy Teacher Education and Assessments

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 49 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2005Alignment, High Stakes, and the Inflation of Test Scores 2017The Response to High Stakes Testing in Chile, 2005-2013: Legitimate and Illegitimate Ways to Raise Test Scores 2017Interrelations between policymakers’ intentions and school agents’ interpretation of accountability policy in Israel 2011Lessons from test-based education reform in the U.S.2015Teacher-based reactivity to provincial large-scale assessment in Canada

Details

Year2001

Typedataset

Published2001-01-01

VenuePsycEXTRA Dataset

Languageen

Citations49

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Identifiers

doi10.1037/e648282011-001

openalex_workW4232172575

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.