Organizational Identity Formation and Change

Dennis A. Gioia · Shubha D. Patvardhan · Aimee L. Hamilton · Kevin G. Corley

732 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Annals

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Management and Organizational Studies Corporate Identity and Reputation Organizational Strategy and Culture

Abstract

Theory and research concerning organizational identity (“who we are as an organization”) is a burgeoning domain within organization study. A great deal of conceptual and empirical work has been accomplished within the last three decades—especially concerning the phenomenon of organizational identity change. More recently, work has been devoted to studying the processes and content associated with identity formation. Given the amount of scholarly work done to date, it is an appropriate time to reflect on the perspectives, controversies and outcomes of this body of work. Because organizational identity change has received the preponderance of attention, we first review that extensive literature. We consider the conceptual and empirical work concerning the three putative “pillars” of identity (i.e. that which is ostensibly central, enduring, and distinctive). We devote particular attention to the most controversial of these pillars—the debate pitting a view that sees identity as stable over time (a position we term as the “enduring identity proposition”) and a contrasting stance that sees identity as more changeable (the “dynamic identity proposition”). Following our review of the identity change literature, we next take up a review of the notably smaller compendium of work on identity formation. We consider the conceptual and empirical work devoted to studying the external influences on, as well as the internal resources used, to fashion a nascent identity. Finally, we discuss in more depth the controversies associated with the pillars of identity, assess the four prevalent views on organizational identity (the social construction, social actor, institutionalist, and population ecologist views), assimilate the research on both identity formation and change, and consider the prospects for future work on both phenomena.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 732 citations exist upstream.

References

1983The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields 1977Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony 1995Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches 1996Sensemaking in Organizations 1986Research in Organizational Behavior.1986Psychology of intergroup relations 1989Social Identity Theory and the Organization 1977The Population Ecology of Organizations

Cited by

2017Bowing before Dual Gods: How Structured Flexibility Sustains Organizational Hybridity 2016Social Activism in and Around Organizations 2014The Possibilities of Phenomenology for Organizational Research 2015Integrating the organizational change literature: a model for successful change 2015The Many Faces of Culture: Making Sense of 30 Years of Research on Culture in Organization Studies 2013Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.