References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2012The Effects of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High- proficient L2 Learners74 cited
• 2010Written Corrective Feedback: The Practitioners’ Perspective68 cited
• 2017Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Student Perceptions64 cited
• 2012Feedback on the Feedback: Sociocultural Interpretation of Saudi ESL Learners’ Opinions about Writing Feedback47 cited
• 2011Correcting students’ written grammatical errors: The effects of negotiated versus nonnegotiated feedback45 cited
• 2010Developing Second Language Writing Through Scaffolding In The ZPD: A Magazine Project For An Authentic Audience41 cited
• 2011Writing Instruction and Policies for Written Corrective Feedback in the Basic Language Sequence37 cited
• 1999Avoiding the Proofreading Trap: The Value of the Error Correction Process31 cited
• 2012A Case for Direct and Indirect Feedback: The Other Side of Coin31 cited
• 2017Improving Grammatical Accuracy in Thai Learners' Writing : Comparing Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback30 cited
• 2014UAE University Male Students’ Interests Impact on Reading and Writing Performance and Improvement30 cited
• 2013The Effects of Written Corrective Feedback Techniques on EFL Students’ Control over Grammatical Construction of Their Written English26 cited
• 2016Written Corrective Feedback: Preferences and Justifications of Teachers and Students in a Thai Context