Twitter as a Technical Communication Platform: How IT Companies' Message Characteristics Relate to Online Engagement

Shu Zhang · Menno D.T. de Jong · Jordy F. Gosselt

7 citations0/0 files storedTechnical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Relations and Crisis Communication Digital Marketing and Social Media Media and Digital Communication

Abstract

Purpose: Twitter is a promising technical communication platform for companies, but a thorough understanding of how it works best is lacking. This study analyzes characteristics of IT companies' technical communication tweets and relates them to users' online engagement (likes, retweets, replies). Three message characteristics were included: content, message elements, and communication strategies. Method: We collected technical communication tweets posted by four IT companies in two weeks (N = 1,604). We developed a content categorization and also coded the tweets for message elements, communication strategies, and online engagement. Message elements and communication strategies were compared with those used in the companies' corporate and marketing communication tweets. Negative binomial regression analyses were used to map relationships between message characteristics and online engagement. Results: Ten content types were distinguished, illustrating the versatile nature of technical communication on Twitter. Hyperlinks were the most prominent message element; two types of elements were less prevalent: elements enhancing attractiveness (photos, videos, emojis) and elements connecting to a broader Twitter discourse (hashtags, mentions). Communication strategies did not include community-building tweets; evoking action was most prominent. Several links were found between message characteristics and online engagement: Providing user instructions or updates and feedback opportunities, including photos or videos, and providing one-way information promoted online engagement. Conclusion: Although Twitter might work differently for technical communication than for other domains, it seems fruitful to add more attractive message elements and explore community-building strategies within technical communication. However, there is also reason to relativize the importance of online engagement indicators for technical communication.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology 2016Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead 2012Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing 2006Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies 2012Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less 2014Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages 2003The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents 2017Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.