Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals

16 references·2 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009How Professors Think1,084 cited
2016Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition685 cited
2011Scientific peer review563 cited
2013The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals432 cited
2017Gender bias in scholarly peer review380 cited
2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping337 cited
2013Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics332 cited
2017Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective303 cited
2017Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science282 cited
2019The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals276 cited
2004Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial268 cited
2020Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge259 cited
2002Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review230 cited
2021Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals227 cited
2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

218 cited

2021Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals196 cited

Cited by

2023Analysis of peer reviewers’ response to invitations by gender and geographical region: cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 19 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic32 cited
2022Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals14 cited