SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Investing in the Academic Writing: Training Future Reviewers and Sustaining Efficient and Quality Peer Review
16 references·1 citing·49 second hopsampled
Investing in the Academic Writing: Training Future Reviewers and Sustaining Efficient and Quality Peer Review (2022)Investing in the Academic Writing: Traini…The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The limitations to our unders…How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? (2020)How many manuscripts should I…Guidelines for open peer review implementation (2019)Guidelines for open peer revi…Early career researchers and their authorship and peer review beliefs and practices: An international study (2019)Early career researchers and …Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts (2019)Co-reviewing and ghostwriting…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Peer review: tips from field experts for junior reviewers (2015)Peer review: tips from field …Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial (2012)Does mentoring new peer revie…Peer Reviewer Training and Editor Support: Results From an International Survey of Nursing Peer Reviewers (2009)Peer Reviewer Training and Ed…It's About Time!!!! (2009)It's About Time!!!!Training students to become successful peer reviewers (2005)Training students to become s…Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Effects of training on qualit…Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews (2002)Effect of Written Feedback by…Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers (2002)Effect of structured workshop…Effect of Attendance at a Training Session on Peer Reviewer Quality and Performance (1998)Effect of Attendance at a Tra…Tips and tricks for how to become a good reviewer (2023)Tips and tricks for how to be…Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality (1986)Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1999)Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial (2007)Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review (2019)Thought and language (1962)Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978)Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (1987)Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments? (2000)The Effectiveness of Second Language Strategy Instruction: A Meta‐analysis (2011)The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing (2019)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1998)Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance (1998)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2006)Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms (1992)The ethics of peer review in bioethics (2013)Complex Problem Solving (2014)Editorial: Peer Review and the Editorial Process - A Look Behind the Curtain (2014)Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field (2017)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research (2019)Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ (2020)Innovative Strategies for Peer Review (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A Chronicle of Higher Education (2017)Improving peer‐review by developing reviewers' feedback literacy (2021)Peer-reviewing in Surgical Journals: Revolutionize or Perish? (2021)Why early-career researchers should step up to the peer-review plate (2022)Bias in peer review (2012)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2005Training students to become successful peer reviewers400 cited
  • 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review383 cited
  • 2004Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial268 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review232 cited
  • 2019Guidelines for open peer review implementation92 cited
  • 2012Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial89 cited
  • 1998Effect of Attendance at a Training Session on Peer Reviewer Quality and Performance78 cited
  • 2002Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews76 cited
  • 2019Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts66 cited
  • 2009Peer Reviewer Training and Editor Support: Results From an International Survey of Nursing Peer Reviewers59 cited
  • 2002Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers53 cited
  • 2019Early career researchers and their authorship and peer review beliefs and practices: An international study50 cited
  • 2020How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?33 cited
  • 2009

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

It's About Time!!!!
16 cited
  • 2015Peer review: tips from field experts for junior reviewers11 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Tips and tricks for how to become a good reviewer8 cited