SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fragility of statistically significant outcomes in randomized trials comparing bariatric surgeries
11 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Fragility of statistically significant outcomes in randomized trials comparing bariatric surgeries (2023)Fragility of statistically significant ou…The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Gynaecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review (2021)The Fragility of Statisticall…The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Achilles Tendon Injury Research: A Systematic Review (2021)The Fragility of Statistical …Meta-analyses in paediatric surgery are often fragile: implications and consequences (2021)Meta-analyses in paediatric s…The weakness of fragility index exposed in an analysis of the traumatic brain injury management guidelines: A meta-epidemiological and simulation study (2020)The weakness of fragility ind…Systematic Evaluation of the Robustness of the Evidence Supporting Current Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization Using the Fragility Index (2019)Systematic Evaluation of the …Are results from randomized trials in anesthesiology robust or fragile? An analysis using the fragility index (2019)Are results from randomized t…The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery (2018)The Robustness of Trials That…The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery (2018)The fragility of statisticall…The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey (2016)The Fragility of Statisticall…Randomized controlled trial: the gold standard or an unobtainable fallacy? (2015)Randomized controlled trial: …The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2003)Hawthorne effect reporting in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: truth or myth? Blessing or curse? (2017)Art Therapy for Psychosocial Problems in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Narrative Review on Art Therapeutic Means and Forms of Expression, Therapist Behavior, and Supposed Mechanisms of Change (2020)Randomized-controlled trials are methodologically inappropriate in adolescent transgender healthcare (2023)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Statistical Fragility and the Role of P Values in the Sports Medicine Literature (2018)The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review (2018)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Fragility of clinical trials across research fields: A synthesis of methodological reviews (2020)Quality of Prospective Controlled Randomized Trials (2007)The fragility of findings of randomized controlled trials in shoulder and elbow surgery (2019)The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Cartilage Restoration of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Patellofemoral Instability Research: A Systematic Review (2021)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Empirical assessment of fragility index based on a large database of clinical studies in the Cochrane Library (2022)Statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials in high-impact journals has improved but was low across medical specialties (2022)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Fragility Index of Recently Published Meta-Analyses in Pediatric Urology: A Striking Observation (2021)Predictors of Increased Fragility Index Scores in Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: An Umbrella Review (2023)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)The fragility of statistical significance in distal femur fractures: systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2022)The Statistical Fragility of Orbital Fractures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2023)The statistical fragility of outcomes in calcaneus fractures: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)The Fragility of Landmark Randomized Controlled Trials in the Plastic Surgery Literature (2024)How fragile are Mediterranean diet interventions? A research-on-research study of randomised controlled trials (2021)The fragility of significant results from randomized controlled trials in esophageal surgeries (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
  • 2016The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey172 cited
  • 2015Randomized controlled trial: the gold standard or an unobtainable fallacy?124 cited
  • 2018The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery74 cited
  • 2018The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery32 cited
  • 2020The weakness of fragility index exposed in an analysis of the traumatic brain injury management guidelines: A meta-epidemiological and simulation study31 cited
  • 2021The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Achilles Tendon Injury Research: A Systematic Review29 cited
  • 2019Systematic Evaluation of the Robustness of the Evidence Supporting Current Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization Using the Fragility Index28 cited
  • 2021The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Gynaecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review20 cited
  • 2021Meta-analyses in paediatric surgery are often fragile: implications and consequences17 cited
  • 2019Are results from randomized trials in anesthesiology robust or fragile? An analysis using the fragility index16 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work