SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Academic Journals, Incentives, and the Quality of Peer Review: A Model
16 references·0 citing·52 second hop
Academic Journals, Incentives, and the Quality of Peer Review: A Model (2023)Academic Journals, Incentives, and the Qu…Is Peer Review a Good Idea? (2019)Is Peer Review a Good Idea?Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Prestigious Science Journals …Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality (2015)Article processing charges in…Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)Measuring the effectiveness o…Scientific peer review (2011)Scientific peer reviewEditorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? (2010)Editorial Peer Reviewers' Rec…Single- versus double-blind reviewing (2006)Single- versus double-blind r…Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics (2004)Perceptions of journal qualit…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory (2002)Evolving Standards for Academ…Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Association of Journal Qualit…Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Reproducibility of peer revie…Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)Have referees rejected some o…The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)The reliability of peer revie…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Publication prejudices: An ex…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1960)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE. (2004)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. (2006)Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Epistemic Exclusion of Women Faculty and Faculty of Color: Understanding Scholar(ly) Devaluation as a Predictor of Turnover Intentions (2021)Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2002)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2005)Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility (2006)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)The American Psychological Association (1919)Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1971)Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders (1975)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Toward an Integration of Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives on Social Inference: A Biased Hypothesis-Testing Model (1987)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Ranking Games (2014)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Impact Factor Fallacy (2018)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences (2022)Job Market Signaling (1973)The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)Economics : an emerging small world? (2004)The Economics of Science (2010)A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 2011Scientific peer review563 cited
  • 1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation496 cited
  • 2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping337 cited
  • 2002Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles284 cited
  • 2000Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?254 cited
  • 2002Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory252 cited
  • 2018Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability213 cited
  • 2004Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics185 cited
  • 2010Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?177 cited
  • 2019Is Peer Review a Good Idea?137 cited
  • 2015Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

119 cited
  • 2006Single- versus double-blind reviewing118 cited
  • 1996Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?103 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.