SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Citation versus disruption in the military: Analysis of the top disruptive military trauma research publications
16 references·0 citing·52 second hopsampled
Citation versus disruption in the military: Analysis of the top disruptive military trauma research publications (2023)Citation versus disruption in the militar…The Most Disruptive Publications in Craniofacial Surgery (1954–2014) (2021)The Most Disruptive Publicati…The 100 Most-disruptive Articles in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Sub-specialties (1954–2014) (2021)The 100 Most-disruptive Artic…Shifting paradigms: The top 100 most disruptive papers in core pediatric surgery journals (2021)Shifting paradigms: The top 1…Changing the Status Quo: The 100 Most-Disruptive Papers in Urology? (2021)Changing the Status Quo: The …The top 100 most disruptive publications in academic surgery journals: 1954–2014 (2020)The top 100 most disruptive p…Publication Productivity and Academic Rank in Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020)Publication Productivity and …The NIH Open Citation Collection: A public access, broad coverage resource (2019)The NIH Open Citation Collect…Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology (2019)Large teams develop and small…Using bibliometrics to analyze the state of academic productivity in US pediatric surgery training programs (2018)Using bibliometrics to analyz…The h-index Debate: An Introduction for Librarians (2017)The h-index Debate: An Introd…The Slavery of the h-index—Measuring the Unmeasurable (2016)The Slavery of the h-index—Me…Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)…A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change (2016)A Dynamic Network Measure of …Future Science (2013)Future ScienceMethods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline (2010)Methods for measuring the cit…Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts? (2008)Eigenfactor: Does the princip…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property (1988)The skewness of science (1992)A critical review of SCImago Journal & Country Rank (2014)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data (2009)Citation pattern and lifespan: a comparison of discipline, institution, and individual (2011)Reputation and impact in academic careers (2014)Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact (2014)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology (1996)Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (2010)Women are credited less in science than men (2022)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)H-index: however ranked, citations need context (2007)How to judge a book by its cover? How useful are bibliometric indices for the evaluation of “scientific quality” or “scientific productivity”? (2011)Improving the Measurement of Scientific Success by Reporting a Self-Citation Index (2017)Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis (2020)Recognizing New Trends in Brain Drain Studies in the Framework of Global Sustainability (2021)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)Measuring the Impact of Research Using Conventional and Alternative Metrics (2018)Scholarly Productivity and Impact: Developing a Quantifiable, Norm‐based Benchmarking Methodology for Academic Emergency Medicine (2019)Gender gaps in scientific performance: a longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers (2020)Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning (1991)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013)Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks (2021)Social physics (2022)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Science of science (2018)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Predicting translational progress in biomedical research (2019)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)New trends in bibliometric APIs: A comparative analysis (2023)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Sex Differences in Academic Productivity Across Academic Ranks and Specialties in Academic Medicine (2021)Association between women's authorship and women's editorship in infectious diseases journals: a cross-sectional study (2022)Gender Inequalities in Citations of Articles Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals: a Cross-Sectional Study (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2019Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology1,121 cited
  • 2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level507 cited
  • 2016A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change506 cited
  • 2019The NIH Open Citation Collection: A public access, broad coverage resource116 cited
  • 2010Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline108 cited
  • 2008Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts?104 cited
  • 2017The h-index Debate: An Introduction for Librarians87 cited
  • 2020Publication Productivity and Academic Rank in Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis86 cited
  • 2016The Slavery of the h-index—Measuring the Unmeasurable70 cited
  • 2018Using bibliometrics to analyze the state of academic productivity in US pediatric surgery training programs30 cited
  • 2020The top 100 most disruptive publications in academic surgery journals: 1954–201425 cited
  • 2021Changing the Status Quo: The 100 Most-Disruptive Papers in Urology?24 cited
  • 2021The 100 Most-disruptive Articles in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Sub-specialties (1954–2014)24 cited
  • 2021Shifting paradigms: The top 100 most disruptive papers in core pediatric surgery journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

20 cited
  • 2013Future Science20 cited
  • 2021The Most Disruptive Publications in Craniofacial Surgery (1954–2014)17 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.