Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT

9 references·16 citing·28 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2023Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics13,695 cited
2023Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy4,557 cited
2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author1,433 cited
2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
2023ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove868 cited
2023A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education599 cited
2023ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?531 cited
2021Introduction to statistical quality control252 cited
2022Could AI help you to write your next paper?226 cited

Cited by

2023The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors109 cited
2025Talk is cheap: why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI107 cited
2024Unmasking academic cheating behavior in the artificial intelligence era: Evidence from Vietnamese undergraduates73 cited
2024Reviewing the performance of AI detection tools in differentiating between AI-generated and human-written texts: A literature and integrative hybrid review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

56 cited

2024The moderating role of technology proficiency and academic discipline in AI-chatbot adoption within higher education: Insights from a PLS-SEM analysis54 cited

2024Ethical dimensions of generative AI: a cross-domain analysis using machine learning structural topic modeling44 cited

2023PAIGE: A generative AI-based framework for promoting assignment integrity in higher education43 cited

2025Beyond Policing: AI Writing Detection Tools, Trust, Academic Integrity, and Their Implications for College Writing43 cited

2023AI and business management: Tracking future research agenda through bibliometric network analysis41 cited

2024Who Wrote This?38 cited

2024AI Chatbot Adoption in Academia: Task Fit, Usefulness and Collegial Ties28 cited

2024ChatGPT giving advice on how to cheat in university assignments: how workable are its suggestions?25 cited

2025The Role of GenAI in EFL Speaking: Effects on Oral Proficiency, Anxiety and Risk-Taking25 cited

2025Facilitating Generative AI Literacy in the Face of Evolving Technology: Interventions in Marketing Classrooms23 cited

2024Evaluation of AI content generation tools for verification of academic integrity in higher education18 cited

2024Cheat sites and artificial intelligence usage in online introductory physics courses: What is the extent and what effect does it have on assessments?16 cited