SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Legal Policy of Constitutional Complaints in Judicial Review: A Comparison of Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Indonesia
15 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Legal Policy of Constitutional Complaints in Judicial Review: A Comparison of Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Indonesia (2023)Legal Policy of Constitutional Complaints…The Roles of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Determining State-Religion Relations (2022)The Roles of the Indonesian C…To Boldly Go Where No Court Has Gone Before. The German Federal Constitutional Court’s ultra vires Decision of May 5, 2020 (2020)To Boldly Go Where No Court H…The Schmitelsen Court: The Question of Legitimacy (2020)The Schmitelsen Court: The Qu…Do constitutional entrenchment clauses matter? Constitutional review of constitutional amendments in Europe (2020)Do constitutional entrenchmen…Constitutional Identity in Europe: The Identity of the Constitution. A Regional Approach (2020)Constitutional Identity in Eu…The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts in Europe (2019)The Illiberal Abuse of Consti…Asian exceptionalism? Reflections on “Judicial Review in the Contemporary World”: Afterword to the Foreword by Doreen Lustig and J. H. H. Weiler (2019)Asian exceptionalism? Reflect…Judicial Reasoning and Review in the Indonesian Supreme Court (2018)Judicial Reasoning and Review…Constitutional courts as veto players: Lessons from the United States, France and Germany (2017)Constitutional courts as veto…Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens the Constitutional Rights (2017)Constitutional Complaint and …The Political Orientation of the Members of the Hungarian Constitutional Court between 2010 and 2014 (2016)The Political Orientation of …A Prospect and Challenges for Adopting Constitutional Complaint and Constitutional Question in the Indonesian Constitutional Court (2016)A Prospect and Challenges for…Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment (2015)Constitutional Courts in Comp…Rethinking the rise of the German Constitutional Court: From anti-Nazism to value formalism (2014)Rethinking the rise of the Ge…Multilevel cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund (2010)Multilevel cooperation of the…The Evolution of Cooperation (1981)The Evolution of Cooperation (1985)The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century (1992)The Politics of Central Bank Independence (2015)Curbing the Court (2020)Understanding Accountability in Democratic Governance (2023)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (1993)The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited (2003)The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany (2004)The Constitutional Court of Hungary (2017)Populist Challenges to Constitutional Interpretation in Europe and Beyond (2021)The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. (1971)The institutional environment for multinational investment (2000)Veto Players (2002)Ideological influences on governance and regulation: The comparative case of supreme courts (2017)When less is more: ‘Negative resources’ and the performance of presidents and prime ministers (2017)The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization (1999)Judicial deliberations : a comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy (2009)The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia (2015)The Judicial Reform Landscape in Indonesia (2019)The Politics of Court Reform (2019)CONSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION OF “BELIEFS” IN INDONESIA (2020)The Populist Zeitgeist (2004)The Core of the Case against Judicial Review (2006)Political Constitutionalism (2007)The Twin Challenges to Separation of Powers in Central Europe: Technocratic Governance and Populism (2019)Forging, Bending, and Breaking: Enacting the “Illiberal Playbook” in Hungary and Poland (2021)The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union (2022)Three Paths to Constitutionalism – and the Crisis of the European Union (2015)Perbandingan Rekrutmen Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia dengan Jerman (2024)Between Autonomy and Dependence (2012)Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe (2015)EU Values Before the Court of Justice (2023)The Independence and Accountability of the Constitutional Court in the Constitutional System in Indonesia (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment210 cited
  • 2017Constitutional courts as veto players: Lessons from the United States, France and Germany126 cited
  • 2010Multilevel cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund100 cited
  • 2019The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts in Europe92 cited
  • 2020Constitutional Identity in Europe: The Identity of the Constitution. A Regional Approach66 cited
  • 2018Judicial Reasoning and Review in the Indonesian Supreme Court58 cited
  • 2020Do constitutional entrenchment clauses matter? Constitutional review of constitutional amendments in Europe55 cited
  • 2016The Political Orientation of the Members of the Hungarian Constitutional Court between 2010 and 201437 cited
  • 2014Rethinking the rise of the German Constitutional Court: From anti-Nazism to value formalism35 cited
  • 2017Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens the Constitutional Rights22 cited
  • 2016A Prospect and Challenges for Adopting Constitutional Complaint and Constitutional Question in the Indonesian Constitutional Court16 cited
  • 2020To Boldly Go Where No Court Has Gone Before. The German Federal Constitutional Court’s ultra vires Decision of May 5, 202013 cited
  • 2022The Roles of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Determining State-Religion Relations12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019Asian exceptionalism? Reflections on “Judicial Review in the Contemporary World”: Afterword to the Foreword by Doreen Lustig and J. H. H. Weiler11 cited
  • 2020The Schmitelsen Court: The Question of Legitimacy8 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.