SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The future of academic publishing
16 references·6 citing·49 second hop
The future of academic publishing (2023)The future of academic publishingTurning the tide of parachute science (2021)Turning the tide of parachute…The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)The past, present and future …An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports (2021)An Excess of Positive Results…Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? (2020)Are Ideas Getting Harder to F…The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)The foreign gaze: authorship …Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Evaluating the replicability …Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics (2016)Evaluating replicability of l…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Deep impact: unintended conse…Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013)Atypical Combinations and Sci…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewWhy Current Publication Practices May Distort Science (2008)Why Current Publication Pract…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer…The Controversy behind the Controversies: Scientific Discourse in the Twenty-First Century (2025)The Controversy behind the Co…Reproducible research policies and software/data management in scientific computing journals: a survey, discussion, and perspectives (2025)Reproducible research policie…Insights from the top‐cited papers in the critical care nursing literature: A bibliometric and visualized analysis (2025)Insights from the top‐cited p…The changing roles of scientific journals (2024)The changing roles of scienti…Knowledge equity as social justice in academic publishing and why it matters for accounting research (2024)Knowledge equity as social ju…Why can’t we be friends? Bridging the academic/practitioner gap in social marketing (2023)Why can’t we be friends? Brid…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms (1990)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Science of science (2018)Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology (2019)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Toward a new economics of science (1994)A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. (2003)The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes (2010)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Scientific Utopia (2012)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments (2007)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies* (2020)Financial education affects financial knowledge and downstream behaviors (2021)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function (1957)Endogenous Technological Change (1990)The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity (2003)Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics (2017)The impact of artificial intelligence on labor productivity (2021)Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity (2023)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,519 cited
  • 2013Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact1,477 cited
  • 2016Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics1,314 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2020Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?999 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2008Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science502 cited
  • 2021The past, present and future of Registered Reports497 cited
  • 2019The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health445 cited
  • 2013Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank440 cited
  • 2021An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports372 cited
  • 1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Turning the tide of parachute science308 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024The changing roles of scientific journals18 cited
    • 2023Why can’t we be friends? Bridging the academic/practitioner gap in social marketing16 cited
    • 2025Reproducible research policies and software/data management in scientific computing journals: a survey, discussion, and perspectives12 cited
    • 2024Knowledge equity as social justice in academic publishing and why it matters for accounting research12 cited
    • 2025Insights from the top‐cited papers in the critical care nursing literature: A bibliometric and visualized analysis7 cited
    • 2025The Controversy behind the Controversies: Scientific Discourse in the Twenty-First Century5 cited