SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Conceptual and technical work: Who will disrupt science?
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Conceptual and technical work: Who will disrupt science? (2023)Conceptual and technical work: Who will d…Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology (2019)Large teams develop and small…Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citations, Citation Indicator…A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A review of the literature on…Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013)Atypical Combinations and Sci…Theory Construction in Qualitative Research (2012)Theory Construction in Qualit…What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)What do citation counts measu…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration (2004)Coauthorship networks and pat…Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Journal impact factor: a brie…Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry (1991)Co-word analysis as a tool fo…From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)From translations to problema…Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Co‐citation in the scientific…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Networks of Scientific PapersThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific R…Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Bibliographic coupling betwee…The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties (1974)The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason (1975)Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: A literature review and bibliometric analysis (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2018)Past, present, and future of customer engagement (2021)Personalization in personalized marketing: Trends and ways forward (2022)Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility (1990)In search of useful theory of innovation (1993)The Sources of Innovation (2007)How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures (2009)Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight (2010)SciMAT : A new science mapping analysis software tool (2012)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization (2004)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities (1974)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science (2005)Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review (2013)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Basics of Qualitative Research (1992)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Flexible Coding of In-depth Interviews: A Twenty-first-century Approach (2018)What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research (2019)A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research (2023)Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? (2010)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria (1990)Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems (1995)Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage (1998)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions21,164 cited
  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1973Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents5,334 cited
  • 2012Theory Construction in Qualitative Research4,317 cited
  • 1965Networks of Scientific Papers3,124 cited
  • 1963Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers2,873 cited
  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 1991Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry2,108 cited
  • 1983From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis1,948 cited
  • 2004Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration1,937 cited
  • 2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior1,598 cited
  • 2013Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact1,477 cited
  • 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators1,344 cited
  • 2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories1,252 cited
  • 2019Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,040 cited
  • 1999Journal impact factor: a brief review.760 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.