SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A methodological review of population-adjusted indirect comparisons reveals inconsistent reporting and suggests publication bias
16 references·1 citing·45 second hop
A methodological review of population-adjusted indirect comparisons reveals inconsistent reporting and suggests publication bias (2023)A methodological review of population-adj…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Multilevel Network Meta-Regression for Population-Adjusted Treatment Comparisons (2020)Multilevel Network Meta-Regre…Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study (2020)Assessing the performance of …Population Adjustment Methods for Indirect Comparisons: A Review of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals (2019)Population Adjustment Methods…A 25-Year Experience of US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval of Malignant Hematology and Oncology Drugs and Biologics (2018)A 25-Year Experience of US Fo…Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal (2017)Methods for Population-Adjust…Regulatory approval of pharmaceuticals without a randomised controlled study: analysis of EMA and FDA approvals 1999–2014 (2016)Regulatory approval of pharma…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Simulation and Matching-Based Approaches for Indirect Comparison of Treatments (2015)Simulation and Matching-Based…Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Bias due to selective inclusi…No Head-to-Head Trial? Simulate the Missing Arms (2010)No Head-to-Head Trial? Simula…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis (2002)A comparison of summary patie…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data (1995)Practical methodology of meta…An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment (1988)An Assessment of Clinically U…Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Studies in Oncology: A Scoping Review Focused on Reporting Quality (2025)Matching-Adjusted Indirect Co…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Bayesian Methods for Evidence Synthesis in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (2006)Collaborative care for depression in primary care (2006)Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis (2015)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression (2009)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments (2024)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Childhood maltreatment and obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis (2013)The effects of psychotherapies for major depression in adults on remission, recovery and improvement: A meta-analysis (2014)Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2015)Regulatory and clinical consequences of negative confirmatory trials of accelerated approval cancer drugs: retrospective observational study (2021)Trends in the approval of cancer therapies by the FDA in the twenty-first century (2023)Clinical Benefit and Regulatory Outcomes of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews13,845 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 1988An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment1,683 cited
  • 1995Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data492 cited
  • 2017Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal398 cited
  • 2002A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis394 cited
  • 2018A 25-Year Experience of US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval of Malignant Hematology and Oncology Drugs and Biologics298 cited
  • 2014Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions281 cited
  • 2016Regulatory approval of pharmaceuticals without a randomised controlled study: analysis of EMA and FDA approvals 1999–2014186 cited
  • 2020Multilevel Network Meta-Regression for Population-Adjusted Treatment Comparisons181 cited
  • 2015Simulation and Matching-Based Approaches for Indirect Comparison of Treatments

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

110 cited
  • 2019Population Adjustment Methods for Indirect Comparisons: A Review of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals108 cited
  • 2010No Head-to-Head Trial? Simulate the Missing Arms96 cited
  • 2020Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study88 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Studies in Oncology: A Scoping Review Focused on Reporting Quality8 cited