Deciphering consumer commitment: Exploring the dual influence of self‐brand and self‐group relationships

Abstract

Abstract Consumer‐brand relationships are highly valued as brand‐committed consumers are thought to deliver many positive outcomes for affiliated brands. However, in addition to connections between individuals and brands, consumer‐brand relationships also involve relationships between individuals and other brand users. Little attention has been given to the potential consequences associated with commitment to other brand users as compared to the brand itself. Therefore, our framework establishes two distinct types of consumer‐brand relationships (i.e., self‐brand relationships vs. self‐group relationships) that differentially influence brand commitment versus group commitment, leading to contrasting effects on both desirable and undesirable brand outcomes. Specifically, our studies illuminate that while brand commitment is largely associated with favorable brand‐related outcomes, group commitment does not protect against brand switching and is negatively related to willingness to pay price premiums and positive word‐of‐mouth. Our main contribution is uncovering how consumer‐brand relationships face tradeoffs between brand and group attachments, whereby commitment provides both conditional benefits as well as unintended consequences.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.