this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2023Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy4,557 cited
- 2006Uses of Heritage4,077 cited
- 2023ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope2,455 cited
- 2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author1,433 cited
- 2001A Taxonomy for Learning teaching and assessing1,366 cited
- 2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
- 2023ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing913 cited
- 2018Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology911 cited
- 2011The International Journal of Management Education842 cited
- 2023Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists610 cited
- 2023Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use604 cited
- 2023A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education599 cited
- 2023ChatGPT Goes to Law School500 cited
- 2023Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work