Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Is ChatGPT a “Fire of Prometheus” for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers in Academic Writing?

13 references·12 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2023Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence2,124 cited
1889The American Association for the Advancement of Science946 cited
2023ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove868 cited
2023Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use604 cited
2023Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References397 cited
1999Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong386 cited
2023Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened301 cited
1998Non-native Graduate Students’ Thesis/Dissertation Writing in Science: Self-reports by Students and Their Advisors from Two U.S. Institutions267 cited
1999Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong250 cited
2017Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism?179 cited
2023Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?174 cited
1991Science research students' composing processes135 cited
2013Some thoughts on English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP) and related issues132 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

2024Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI86 cited
2025A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science36 cited
2025Advanced multi-lingual writers’ self-directed use of generative AI in academic writing: Rethinking writing, authorship, and learning22 cited
2025Evaluating the potential risks of employing large language models in peer review17 cited
2025Negotiating identity in the age of ChatGPT: non-native English researchers’ experiences with AI-assisted academic writing17 cited
2025Determinants of continuance intention to use GAI in academic research among graduate students:Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA15 cited
2023Will ChatGPT’s Free Language Editing Service Level the Playing Field in Science Communication?: Insights from a Collaborative Project with Non-native English Scholars15 cited
2025Exploring research ethics through the lens of critical posthumanism in the age of Artificial Intelligence15 cited
2024Have AI-Generated Texts from LLM Infiltrated the Realm of Scientific Writing? A Large-Scale Analysis of Preprint Platforms15 cited
2025Generative AI and Perceptual Harms: Who's Suspected of using LLMs?14 cited
2024Delving into PubMed records: some terms in medical writing have drastically changed after the arrival of ChatGPT10 cited
2024Enhancing English abstract quality for non-English speaking authors using ChatGPT: A comparative study of Taiwan, Japan, China, and South Korea with slope graphs8 cited