SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Why are these publications missing? Uncovering the reasons behind the exclusion of documents in free‐access scholarly databases
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Why are these publications missing? Uncovering the reasons behind the exclusion of documents in free‐access scholarly databases (2023)Why are these publications missing? Uncov…The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The journal coverage of Web o…Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Large-scale comparison of bib…Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough (2020)Microsoft Academic Graph: Whe…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Which academic search systems…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Google Scholar to overshadow …Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation (2018)Dimensions: Building Context …Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? (2018)Dimensions: A competitor to S…Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Optimal database combinations…The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web (2014)The Number of Scholarly Docum…Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Impact of data sources on cit…Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Three options for citation tr…Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Scholarly communication and b…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 (1998)Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review (2020)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool (2023)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis5,251 cited
  • 2019Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources2,361 cited
  • 2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study2,104 cited
  • 2021The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis2,085 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2002Scholarly communication and bibliometrics1,133 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations1,016 cited
  • 2007Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar973 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations916 cited
  • 2021Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic864 cited
  • 2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science751 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases686 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough513 cited
  • 2018Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation324 cited
  • 2014The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web321 cited
  • 2018Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?294 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.