SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies in Environmental Health: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review on Traffic-Related Air Pollution
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies in Environmental Health: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review on Traffic-Related Air Pollution (2023)Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studi…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2021)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Risk of Bias Assessments and Evidence Syntheses for Observational Epidemiologic Studies of Environmental and Occupational Exposures: Strengths and Limitations (2020)Risk of Bias Assessments and …Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools (2020)Assessing risk of bias in hum…The Problem With Mechanistic Risk of Bias Assessments in Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies and a Practical Alternative: Assessing the Impact of Specific Sources of Potential Bias (2019)The Problem With Mechanistic …The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures (2018)The risk of bias in observati…The effect of publication bias magnitude and direction on the certainty in evidence (2018)The effect of publication bia…The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence (2017)The GRADE Working Group clari…Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Rating the certainty in evide…Quantifying Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2017)Quantifying Publication Bias …Using GRADE to respond to health questions with different levels of urgency (2016)Using GRADE to respond to hea…Study sensitivity: Evaluating the ability to detect effects in systematic reviews of chemical exposures (2016)Study sensitivity: Evaluating…The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes (2014)The Navigation Guide Systemat…Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments (2014)Systematic Review and Evidenc…Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead (2008)Undue reliance on I 2 in asse…Constructing “Sound Science” and “Good Epidemiology”: Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms (2001)Constructing “Sound Science” …A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)A comparison of results of me…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The current prevalence of child sexual abuse worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2012)The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses (2015)Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. (2017)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE (2018)Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies (2018)Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom (1992)Epidemiology Faces Its Limits (1995)The Cigarette Papers (1996)Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places (2002)The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR (2012)Corporate practices and health: a framework and mechanisms (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (2006)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Using systematic reviews in guideline development: The GRADE approach (2018)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes (2018)Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis (2018)The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses (2019)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Association of Childhood Maltreatment With Suicide Behaviors Among Young People (2020)Effects of physical activity programs on sleep outcomes in older adults: a systematic review (2020)Evaluating the Impact of Attempts to Correct Health Misinformation on Social Media: A Meta-Analysis (2020)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: A methodological systematic review (2021)The MethodologicAl STandards for Epidemiological Research (MASTER) scale demonstrated a unified framework for bias assessment (2021)Unmasking bias in artificial intelligence: a systematic review of bias detection and mitigation strategies in electronic health record-based models (2024)GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks (2020)GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence—An overview in the context of health decision-making (2020)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Quantifying Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis1,671 cited
  • 1992A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction1,517 cited
  • 2008Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead1,286 cited
  • 2017The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence847 cited
  • 2017Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect700 cited
  • 2014Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments433 cited
  • 2014The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes426 cited
  • 2018The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures278 cited
  • 2001Constructing “Sound Science” and “Good Epidemiology”: Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms243 cited
  • 2018The effect of publication bias magnitude and direction on the certainty in evidence203 cited
  • 2020Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools82 cited
  • 2020Risk of Bias Assessments and Evidence Syntheses for Observational Epidemiologic Studies of Environmental and Occupational Exposures: Strengths and Limitations75 cited
  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Problem With Mechanistic Risk of Bias Assessments in Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies and a Practical Alternative: Assessing the Impact of Specific Sources of Potential Bias
66 cited
  • 2021Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury39 cited
  • 2016Study sensitivity: Evaluating the ability to detect effects in systematic reviews of chemical exposures33 cited
  • 2016Using GRADE to respond to health questions with different levels of urgency31 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.