References

• 2002Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?287 cited
• 2018Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability213 cited
• 2018Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice99 cited
• 2008Poor Quality of Reporting Confounding Bias in Observational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review92 cited
• 1992The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors87 cited
• 2020How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey57 cited
• 2014Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature: The SAMPL Guidelines*57 cited
• 2020Learning from a retraction51 cited
• 2007What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion36 cited
• 1985Manuscript Review From a Statistician's Perspective36 cited
• 2021Insufficient transparency of statistical reporting in preclinical research: a scoping review30 cited
• 2018Statistical errors in articles published in radiology journals26 cited
• 2023Peer Review and Scientific Publication at a Crossroads23 cited
• 2018The Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in Cytopathology Studies: Review of 6 Journals