SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do orthopaedics surgeons have any idea what predatory journals are?:(cross-sectional study)
16 references·0 citing·40 second hop
Do orthopaedics surgeons have any idea what predatory journals are?:(cross-sectional study) (2024)Do orthopaedics surgeons have any idea wh…Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Predatory Journals: What They…Coronavirus Disease-2019: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Health Care Workers at Makerere University Teaching Hospitals, Uganda (2020)Coronavirus Disease-2019: Kno…Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible (2020)Changing how we evaluate rese…Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study (2019)Perspectives From Authors and…Why do authors publish in predatory journals? (2018)Why do authors publish in pre…Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Problems and challenges of pr…Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)Negative Effects of “Predator…The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology (2017)The surge of predatory open-a…Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017)Stop this waste of people, an…Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Potential predatory and legit…Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals (2017)Ethical issues in publishing …Controversial website that lists ‘predatory’ publishers shuts down (2017)Controversial website that li…Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)Who publishes in “predatory” …Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)Open access versus subscripti…Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys (1977)Estimating Nonresponse Bias i…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Bias in peer review (2012)Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences (2014)How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies (2019)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)Big data analytics in manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis of research in the field of business management (2021)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. (1992)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)The World Health report 2006 1 : Working together for health 2 (2006)An analytical study on the awareness, attitude and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (2020)Factors determining the knowledge and prevention practice of healthcare workers towards COVID-19 in Amhara region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional survey (2020)Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey (2020)The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios (2020)Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to the COVID-19 pandemic among Bangladeshi youth: a web-based cross-sectional analysis (2021)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study (2004)Introduction (2007)Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines (2008)Predatory Journals: What the Researchers and Authors Should Know (2024)Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys10,334 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2020Coronavirus Disease-2019: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Health Care Workers at Makerere University Teaching Hospitals, Uganda604 cited
  • 2012Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact479 cited
  • 2017Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison384 cited
  • 2014Who publishes in “predatory” journals?360 cited
  • 2017Stop this waste of people, animals and money284 cited
  • 2018Why do authors publish in predatory journals?257 cited
  • 2018Problems and challenges of predatory journals227 cited
  • 2020Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them190 cited
  • 2018Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research129 cited
  • 2017Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals97 cited
  • 2017The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology97 cited
  • 2020Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible69 cited
  • 2017Controversial website that lists ‘predatory’ publishers shuts down

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

57 cited
  • 2019Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study48 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.