SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Rapid Investigation of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Footprints in Scholarly Publications
16 references·0 citing·39 second hop
A Rapid Investigation of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Footprints in Scholarly Publications (2024)A Rapid Investigation of Artificial Intel…Using AI to write scholarly publications (2023)Using AI to write scholarly p…Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threate…The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. (2023)The role of ChatGPT in scient…The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)The ethics of disclosing the …Letter to editor: Academic journals should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in papers (2023)Letter to editor: Academic jo…Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking? (2023)Is using ChatGPT cheating, pl…ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an au…ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)ChatGPT and a new academic re…Artificial intelligence, text generation tools and ChatGPT – does digital watermarking offer a solution? (2023)Artificial intelligence, text…Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: An Overview (2023)Academic Integrity and Artifi…Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: Beyond Student Cheating (2022)Academic Misconduct in Higher…Research integrity is much more than misconduct (2019)Research integrity is much mo…Study of Predatory Open Access Nursing Journals (2016)Study of Predatory Open Acces…Presence of alleged predatory journals in bibliographic databases: Analysis of Beall’s list (2016)Presence of alleged predatory…Predatory journals and their article publishing charges (2014)Predatory journals and their …Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (2013)Principles of Transparency an…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Is Predatory Publishing a Real Threat? Evidence from a Large Database Study (2017)The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals (2017)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Quality of articles published in predatory nursing journals (2017)Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview (2002)Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain (2010)ChatGPT: More Than a “Weapon of Mass Deception” Ethical Challenges and Responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) Perspective (2023)Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: a study on text-matching capabilities (2023)How effort expectancy and performance expectancy interact to trigger higher education students’ uses of ChatGPT for learning (2023)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)HISTORIAE, History of Socio-Cultural Transformation as Linguistic Data Science. A Humanities Use Case (2019)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)Artificial intelligence in developing countries: The impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for development (2023)Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism (2023)Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT (2023)Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? (2017)246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students’ reasons for seeking to outsource academic work (2019)ChatGPT giving advice on how to cheat in university assignments: how workable are its suggestions? (2024)Exploring English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Adoption and Utilisation of ChatGPT for Speaking Practice Through an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (2024)Who Wrote This? (2024)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review (2024)ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review (2023)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review (2023)Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills (2023)The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author1,433 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing913 cited
  • 2023Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use604 cited
  • 2023The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles.289 cited
  • 2023Using AI to write scholarly publications285 cited
  • 2023The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts264 cited
  • 2023Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking?175 cited
  • 2016Study of Predatory Open Access Nursing Journals104 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence, text generation tools and ChatGPT – does digital watermarking offer a solution?103 cited
  • 2014Predatory journals and their article publishing charges73 cited
  • 2016Presence of alleged predatory journals in bibliographic databases: Analysis of Beall’s list52 cited
  • 2013Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing46 cited
  • 2022Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: Beyond Student Cheating39 cited
  • 2023Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: An Overview35 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019Research integrity is much more than misconduct31 cited
  • 2023Letter to editor: Academic journals should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in papers29 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.