The Effect of Digital Green Strategic Orientation On Digital Green Innovation Performance: From the Perspective of Digital Green Business Model Innovation

Shi Yin · Yuanyuan Yu · Nan Zhang

72 citations0/0 files storedSAGE Open

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Environmental Sustainability in Business Digital Innovation in Industries Sustainability and Innovation in Business

Abstract

Digital technology is gradually penetrating into all kinds of business of green innovation and green development. However, China’s industrial Internet technology foundation is weak. Scholars’ researches on the impact of digital green strategic orientation (DGSO) on digital green innovation performance (DGIP) and the intermediary role of digital green business model innovation (DGBMI) is relatively backward. Therefore, it is particularly important to divide the dimensions of DGSO from the perspective of DGBMI to describe the mechanism of DGIP. In this study, multiple regression approach was used to test the effect of DGSO on DGIP. The mediating role of DGBMI was explored through 562 questionnaires. In addition, the study divides the DGSO into three dimensions: green market orientation (GMO), digital green technology orientation (DGTO), and government orientation. DGBMI is divided into two dimensions: efficiency type and integration type. The results are as follows. (1) GMO, DGTO and government orientation all have positive effects on the improvement of DGIP. (2) GMO has a greater impact on integration DGBMI (IDGBMI). The influence of DGTO on efficient DGBMI (EDGBMI) is more significant. (3) Government orientation has a positive impact on EDGBMI. The influence of DGSO on DGIP can be realized through the intermediary role of EDGBMI and IDGBMI. The essence of this research is to help enterprises understand the characteristics of internal and external environment and make digital-green strategy-oriented choices to improve their DGIP. This study has a certain theoretical contribution to elucidating the influence of DGSO on DGIP and the mediating role of DGBMI. This study also provides a practical basis for enterprises’ digital green innovation practice based on their own environmental optimization and matching of DGSO to improve competitiveness.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 72 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.1988On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models 1994A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha 2017Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World 2022A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures 1997Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance 2005The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations 2007The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance

Cited by

2024Exploring the Influencing Factors of Digital Transformation: Empirical Results From SMEs in China 2025How digital orientation drives green innovation: financial constraints as a mediator in Chinese A-share firms 2025How digital capabilities and credit access influence green innovation performance in small and medium enterprises in resource constrained settings 2025Modelling the impact of green operations on SMEs’ performance: the role of green transaction and artificial intelligence

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.