SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The impact of winning funding on researcher productivity, results from a randomized trial
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
The impact of winning funding on researcher productivity, results from a randomized trial (2024)The impact of winning funding on research…The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science (2022)The Benefits, Barriers, and R…The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF Research Grants (2021)The value of research funding…Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Academic criteria for promoti…Early-career setback and future career impact (2019)Early-career setback and futu…Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citations, Citation Indicator…Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency (2019)Are gender gaps due to evalua…The Altmetric Attention Score: What Does It Mean and Why Should I Care? (2018)The Altmetric Attention Score…Better Lucky Than Rich? Welfare Analysis of Automobile Licence Allocations in Beijing and Shanghai (2017)Better Lucky Than Rich? Welfa…NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity (2016)NIH peer review percentile sc…On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers (2013)On the time spent preparing g…The impact of national research funds: A regression discontinuity approach to the Chilean FONDECYT (2012)The impact of national resear…Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis (2012)Publication of NIH funded tri…The impact of NIH postdoctoral training grants on scientific productivity (2011)The impact of NIH postdoctora…The Effects of Medicaid Coverage — Learning from the Oregon Experiment (2011)The Effects of Medicaid Cover…Measuring the Gains from Medical Research: An Economic Approach (2003)Measuring the Gains from Medi…Building Programme Evaluation into the Design of Public Research-Support Programmes (2002)Building Programme Evaluation…Using Maimonides' Rule to Estimate the Effect of Class Size on Student Achievement (1997)Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education (1999)Using Maimonides' Rule to Estimate the Effect of Class Size on Scholastic Achievement (1999)Firm Performance and State Innovation Funding: Evidence from China's Innofund Program (2015)NIH funding and the pursuit of edge science (2020)The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long‐Run Impact of the SBIR Program (1999)Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence (2000)Government failure versus market failure: microeconomics policy research and government performance (2007)Estimating the Benefits of Targeted R&D Subsidies (2012)Classical peer review: an empty gun (2010)Feminist scholars working around the neoliberal university (2017)Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence (2017)Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions (2019)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Correlation Between Altmetric Score and Citations in Pediatric Surgery Core Journals (2019)Examining the Correlation Between Altmetric Score and Citations in the Urology Literature (2019)A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor? (2021)Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians (2000)Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (2002)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity (2019)In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity (2020)Intersectional inequalities in science (2022)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods (2020)Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023)Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks (2001)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Diversity and representation in infant research: Barriers and bridges toward a globalized science of infant development (2023)Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation (2024)Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries (2025)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Estimating the economic value to societies of the impact of health research: a critical review. (2004)Effect of a US National Institutes of Health programme of clinical trials on public health and costs (2006)Trading Off Consumption and COVID-19 Deaths (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories1,252 cited
  • 2019Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency570 cited
  • 2012Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis371 cited
  • 2003Measuring the Gains from Medical Research: An Economic Approach250 cited
  • 2020Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities241 cited
  • 2002Building Programme Evaluation into the Design of Public Research-Support Programmes239 cited
  • 2018The Altmetric Attention Score: What Does It Mean and Why Should I Care?183 cited
  • 2013On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers157 cited
  • 2022The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science150 cited
  • 2011The impact of NIH postdoctoral training grants on scientific productivity135 cited
  • 2011The Effects of Medicaid Coverage — Learning from the Oregon Experiment134 cited
  • 2019Early-career setback and future career impact129 cited
  • 2017Better Lucky Than Rich? Welfare Analysis of Automobile Licence Allocations in Beijing and Shanghai122 cited
  • 2016NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

111 cited
  • 2012The impact of national research funds: A regression discontinuity approach to the Chilean FONDECYT109 cited
  • 2021The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF Research Grants106 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.