SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Experts, coders and crowds: An analysis of substitutability
12 references·0 citing·53 second hop
Experts, coders and crowds: An analysis of substitutability (2024)Experts, coders and crowds: An analysis o…Large language models as a substitute for human experts in annotating political text (2024)Large language models as a su…Large language models and political science (2023)Large language models and pol…Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency (2019)Searching for Bright Lines in…Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics (2018)Recruiting large online sampl…Can the online crowd match real expert judgments? How task complexity and coder location affect the validity of crowd‐coded data (2018)Can the online crowd match re…A Pairwise Comparison Framework for Fast, Flexible, and Reliable Human Coding of Political Texts (2017)A Pairwise Comparison Framewo…The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market∗ (2016)The Online Laboratory: Conduc…Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict (2016)Crowdsourcing the Measurement…Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data (2016)Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: …V-Dem: A New Way to Measure Democracy (2014)V-Dem: A New Way to Measure D…Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning (2010)Reliability and validity of t…Combining Expert Judgments: A Bayesian Approach (1977)Combining Expert Judgments: A…Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979)The Transformation of European Social Democracy (1994)Reliability and Validity Assessment (2011)When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs (2012)Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition (2012)Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition (2015)The Consensus of Subjective Probability Distributions (1968)Consensus and Uncertainty in Economic Prediction (1983)Combining Economic Forecasts (1986)Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change (2017)Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (2013)Measuring High Level Democratic Principles Using the V-Dem Data (2015)The Myth of Democratic Recession (2015)Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe, 1900–2017 (2018)Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? (2002)A Dynamic Model of Speech for the Social Sciences (2021)The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior (2021)How to train your stochastic parrot: large language models for political texts (2025)Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys (2013)The Generalizability of Survey Experiments (2015)The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples (2016)Rapid assessment of psychological and epidemiological correlates of COVID-19 concern, financial strain, and health-related behavior change in a large online sample (2020)Influencing climate change attitudes in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation (2022)Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy (1959)The Strategy of Conflict (1960)Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. (1972)The Majoritarian Threat to Liberal Democracy (2021)Experiments and Surveys on Political Elites (2022)Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding (2023)The Evolution of Cooperation (1981)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation (1999)Spontaneous giving and calculated greed (2012)oTree - An Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments (2016)Statistical physics of human cooperation (2017)Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election (2017)Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification (2018)A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)Expert-level policy style measurement via knowledge distillation with large language model collaboration (2025)Piercing a Methodological Bubble: Large Language Models and the Social Sciences (2026)Using large language models to analyze political texts through natural language understanding (2026)ChatGPT for Text Annotation? Mind the Hype! (2023)ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks (2023)ChatGPT-4 Outperforms Experts and Crowd Workers in Annotating Political Twitter Messages with Zero-Shot Learning (2023)Synthetic Replacements for Human Survey Data? The Perils of Large Language Models (2024)Are chatbots reliable text annotators? Sometimes (2025)Codebook LLMs: Evaluating LLMs as Measurement Tools for Political Science Concepts (2025)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility (1989)Large-Scale Computerized Text Analysis in Political Science: Opportunities and Challenges (2017)Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2019)Word Embeddings: What Works, What Doesn’t, and How to Tell the Difference for Applied Research (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market∗1,494 cited
  • 2018Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics569 cited
  • 2010Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning495 cited
  • 1977Combining Expert Judgments: A Bayesian Approach350 cited
  • 2014V-Dem: A New Way to Measure Democracy323 cited
  • 2016Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data296 cited
  • 2019Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency159 cited
  • 2024Large language models as a substitute for human experts in annotating political text103 cited
  • 2017A Pairwise Comparison Framework for Fast, Flexible, and Reliable Human Coding of Political Texts45 cited
  • 2023Large language models and political science41 cited
  • 2018Can the online crowd match real expert judgments? How task complexity and coder location affect the validity of crowd‐coded data19 cited
  • 2016Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work