SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ophthalmology Journals’ Guidelines on Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Analysis
7 references·0 citing·17 second hop
Ophthalmology Journals’ Guidelines on Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Analysis (2024)Ophthalmology Journals’ Guidelines on Gen…Rethinking research and generative artificial intelligence (2024)Rethinking research and gener…Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis (2024)Publishers’ and journals’ ins…ChatGPT’s ability to generate realistic experimental images poses a new challenge to academic integrity (2024)ChatGPT’s ability to generate…Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge (2023)Nonhuman “Authors” and Implic…Development of the ChatGPT, Generative Artificial Intelligence and Natural Large Language Models for Accountable Reporting and Use (CANGARU) Guidelines (2023)Development of the ChatGPT, G…Daily briefing: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers (2023)Daily briefing: ChatGPT liste…ChatGPT: standard reporting guidelines for responsible use (2023)ChatGPT: standard reporting g…Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Guidelines for ethical use and acknowledgement of large language models in academic writing (2024)Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals (2024)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)How is ChatGPT acknowledged in academic publications? (2024)A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science (2024)A systematic examination of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use guidelines in applied linguistics journals (2025)Policies on artificial intelligence chatbots among academic publishers: a cross-sectional audit (2025)Large language models through the lens of ubuntu for health research in sub-Saharan Africa (2024)SustAInable Employability: Sustainable Employability in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge420 cited
  • 2024Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis259 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT: standard reporting guidelines for responsible use56 cited
  • 2024ChatGPT’s ability to generate realistic experimental images poses a new challenge to academic integrity32 cited
  • 2023Daily briefing: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers23 cited
  • 2023Development of the ChatGPT, Generative Artificial Intelligence and Natural Large Language Models for Accountable Reporting and Use (CANGARU) Guidelines16 cited
  • 2024Rethinking research and generative artificial intelligence14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work