SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Alternative models of funding curiosity-driven research
16 references·0 citing·53 second hopsampled
Alternative models of funding curiosity-driven research (2025)Alternative models of funding curiosity-d…The unequal impact of parenthood in academia (2021)The unequal impact of parenth…NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores (2020)NIH peer review: Criterion sc…Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions (2019)Contest models highlight inhe…Concentration or dispersal of research funding? (2019)Concentration or dispersal of…Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency (2019)Are gender gaps due to evalua…A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation (2019)A Toolkit of Policies to Prom…The Matthew effect in science funding (2018)The Matthew effect in science…Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications (2018)Low agreement among reviewers…Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery (2016)Research Funding: the Case fo…Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands (2015)Gender contributes to persona…Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals? (2015)Big names or big ideas: Do pe…PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE (2014)PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVA…Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation (2011)Public Value Mapping and Scie…Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications and Funding Outcomes for Medical School Faculty (2008)Gender Differences in Researc…Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis (2007)Gender differences in grant p…Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity (2005)Exploring size and agglomerat…Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth (1986)Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations (1991)Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models (1998)Asymmetric nexus between economic policy uncertainty, renewable energy technology budgets, and environmental sustainability: Evidence from the United States (2021)Notching R&D Investment with Corporate Income Tax Cuts in China (2021)Green bonds, financing constraints, and green innovation (2022)Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Discretion in Hiring* (2017)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution (2019)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis (2013)THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE:: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (2017)Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. (1989)Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆ (2009)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations (2018)Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation (2019)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function (1957)The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States (1964)Value in ethics and economics (1994)Measuring the societal impact of research (2012)A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation (2013)Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework (2021)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data (2007)How Professors Think (2009)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions (2020)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty: Comment (2004)Systemic and Reflexive: Foundations of Cumulative Dis/Advantage and Life-Course Processes (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Global citation inequality is on the rise (2021)Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians (2000)Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (2002)The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity (2019)In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity (2020)Intersectional inequalities in science (2022)Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations (1993)The environment and directed technical change (2012)Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions (2021)The New Economics of Industrial Policy (2024)Children and Their Parents' Labor Supply: Evidence from Exogenous Variation in Family Size (1996)Why So Slow? (1999)Supporting women in academia during and after a global pandemic (2021)Underrepresentation of women in computer systems research (2022)Masculine Defaults in Academic Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Fields (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2018The Matthew effect in science funding636 cited
  • 2019A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation577 cited
  • 2019Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency570 cited
  • 2014PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE506 cited
  • 2007Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis336 cited
  • 2021The unequal impact of parenthood in academia320 cited
  • 2011Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation308 cited
  • 2015Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands305 cited
  • 2015Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?225 cited
  • 2018Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications210 cited
  • 2016Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery162 cited
  • 2008Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications and Funding Outcomes for Medical School Faculty147 cited
  • 2005Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity131 cited
  • 2020NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores124 cited
  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions
120 cited
  • 2019Concentration or dispersal of research funding?114 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.