SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are there too many papers by the same authors within the same conference proceedings? Norms and extremities within the field of human–computer interaction
16 references·0 citing·55 second hop
Are there too many papers by the same authors within the same conference proceedings? Norms and extremities within the field of human–computer interaction (2025)Are there too many papers by the same aut…The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The strain on scientific publ…The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review (2023)The problems with systematic …Maximizing virtual meetings and conferences: a review of best practices (2020)Maximizing virtual meetings a…Mapping child–computer interaction research through co-word analysis (2020)Mapping child–computer intera…Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days (2018)Thousands of scientists publi…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…CHI 1994-2013 (2014)CHI 1994-2013Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures (2013)Journal acceptance rates: A c…Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013)Atypical Combinations and Sci…Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Honorary and ghost authorship…The role of conference publications in CS (2010)The role of conference public…The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)The rate of growth in scienti…“You don’t say what you know, only what you can”: The perceptions and practices of senior Spanish academics regarding research dissemination in English (2010)“You don’t say what you know,…Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings (2009)Scientometric analysis of the…Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)Citation counting, citation r…20 Years of Four HCI Conferences: A Visual Exploration (2007)20 Years of Four HCI Conferen…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Scientific peer review (2011)The natural selection of bad science (2016)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Discourse Community, Legitimate Peripheral Participation, and the Nonnative-English-Speaking Scholar (2000)Worlds of written discourse (2004)Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future (2008)Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers (2011)Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap (2017)Linguistic Injustice in the Writing of Research Articles in English as a Second Language: Data From Taiwanese and Mexican Researchers (2018)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015)Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis (2015)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms (1990)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Science of science (2018)Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology (2019)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)When Authorship Fails (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies (2019)The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature (2021)Generative AI and the Automating of Academia (2023)Carbon footprint of the University of Cape Town (2011)To Beam or Not to Beam (2016)How Do Travel Costs Shape Collaboration? (2020)Involving Older Adults During COVID-19 Restrictions in Developing an Ecosystem Supporting Active Aging: Overview of Alternative Elicitation Methods and Common Requirements From Five European Countries (2022)Building a queer- and trans-inclusive microbiology conference (2023)Environmental Rule of Law: Tracking Progress and Charting Future Directions (2023)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2010)The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional metaresearch study (2023)Detecting jingle and jangle fallacies by identifying consistencies and variabilities in study specifications – a call for research (2024)Sample Sizes for 10 Types of Qualitative Data Analysis: An Integrative Review, Empirical Guidance, and Next Steps (2024)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The forced battle between peer-review and scientometric research assessment: Why the CoARA initiative is unsound (2024)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)The peer-review crisis: how to fix an overloaded system (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
  • 2013Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact1,477 cited
  • 2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index964 cited
  • 2011Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey485 cited
  • 2008Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science370 cited
  • 2024The strain on scientific publishing307 cited
  • 2018Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days241 cited
  • 2023The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review191 cited
  • 2010“You don’t say what you know, only what you can”: The perceptions and practices of senior Spanish academics regarding research dissemination in English181 cited
  • 2020Maximizing virtual meetings and conferences: a review of best practices176 cited
  • 2014CHI 1994-2013175 cited
  • 2013Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures120 cited
  • 2009Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings118 cited
  • 200720 Years of Four HCI Conferences: A Visual Exploration

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

106 cited
  • 2010The role of conference publications in CS100 cited
  • 2020Mapping child–computer interaction research through co-word analysis86 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.