SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rhetorical distinctions: Comparing metadiscourse in essays by ChatGPT and students · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleRhetorical distinctions: Comparing metadiscourse in essays by ChatGPT and students

Feng Kevin Jiang2025

Article2025

Rhetorical distinctions: Comparing metadiscourse in essays by ChatGPT and students

Feng Kevin Jiang · Ken Hyland

44 citations·0/0 files stored·English for Specific Purposes

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Discourse Analysis in Language Studies EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Linguistics and Discourse Analysis

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 44 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing 2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers 2001Bringing in the Reader 2007Applying a Gloss: Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse 2018“In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse 2023Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing 2011Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language 2016Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays

Cited by

2025Metadiscursive nouns in academic argument: ChatGPT vs student practices

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2025Does ChatGPT Write Like a Student? Engagement Markers in Argumentative Essaysarticle · 7 shared references 2023Metadiscourse in academic writing: A systematic reviewreview · 6 shared references 2025Metadiscursive nouns in academic argument: ChatGPT vs student practicesarticle · 6 shared references 2023‘The study has clear limitations’: Presentation of limitations in conclusion sections of PhD dissertations and research articles in applied linguisticsarticle · 6 shared references 2020A review of research on authorial evaluation in English academic writing: A methodological perspectivearticle · 5 shared references 2021Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overviewarticle · 4 shared references

Details

Year2025

Typearticle

Published2025-03-31

VenueEnglish for Specific Purposes

ISSN-L0889-4906

Languageen

Citations44

Files0 public / 0

ShelfDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.esp.2025.03.001

openalex_workW4408995547

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.