SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rhetorical distinctions: Comparing metadiscourse in essays by ChatGPT and students
16 references·1 citing·48 second hop
Rhetorical distinctions: Comparing metadiscourse in essays by ChatGPT and students (2025)Rhetorical distinctions: Comparing metadi…Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement (2024)Graduate students’ use of Cha…A real-world test of artificial intelligence infiltration of a university examinations system: A “Turing Test” case study (2024)A real-world test of artifici…Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Comparing scientific abstract…Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing (2023)Can linguists distinguish bet…Corpus approaches to discourse: a critical review (2019)Corpus approaches to discours…The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students' timed argumentative essays (2018)The use of metadiscourse and …“In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse (2018)“In this paper we suggest”: C…Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays (2016)Interactions in L1 and L2 und…“We must conclude that…”: A diachronic study of academic engagement (2016)“We must conclude that…”: A d…Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education (2013)Genres across the Disciplines…Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language (2011)Corpus Approaches to Evaluati…Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspectives (2010)Metadiscourse: Diverse and Di…Applying a Gloss: Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse (2007)Applying a Gloss: Exemplifyin…Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing (2006)Metadiscourse: Exploring Inte…Hedging, Inflating, and Persuading in L2 Academic Writing. (2005)Hedging, Inflating, and Persu…Bringing in the Reader (2001)Bringing in the ReaderMetadiscursive nouns in academic argument: ChatGPT vs student practices (2025)Metadiscursive nouns in acade…Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse (1985)Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing (1993)Research Genres: Explorations and Applications (2004)The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly (2010)Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering (2014)Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EAP lessons and university lectures (2014)The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English (2005)A model of trust-repair discourse (2014)Evolving systemic functional linguistics: beyond the clause (2014)Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A Case Study of ‘Evaluation’ (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Introduction to functional grammar . By M. A. K. Halliday London & Baltimore: Edward Arnold, 1985. Pp. xxxv, 387. (1989)Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (2000)Linguistic Variation in Research Articles (2015)Research Methods in Education (2007)Genre and academic writing in the disciplines (2008)Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective (2008)Metadiscourse: Mapping Interactions in Academic Writing (2010)An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2014)Authority and invisibility (2002)Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal (2004)Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse (2005)Argumentation & second language writing: Are we missing the boat? (2017)At the same time : Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 university student argumentative writing (2017)Evidentiality : The linguistic coding of epistemology. Edited by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols. (Advances in discourse processes, 20.) Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986. Pp. xi, 346. (1991)Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (2001)“So and so” says, states and argues: A corpus-assisted engagement analysis of reporting verbs (2019)Applying local grammars to the diachronic investigation of discourse acts in academic writing: The case of exemplification in Linguistics research articles (2021)Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview (2021)Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text (2023)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (1988)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review (2023)Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance (2024)Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018)Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT (2023)Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials (2023)Generative AI and Second Language Writing (2025)Rethinking the importance of social norms in generative AI adoption: investigating the acceptance and use of generative AI among higher education students (2025)University students’ engagement with generative AI-supported automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback (2025)The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse (2007)Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals (2011)Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing1,226 cited
  • 2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
  • 2001Bringing in the Reader374 cited
  • 2007Applying a Gloss: Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse282 cited
  • 2018“In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse264 cited
  • 2023Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing260 cited
  • 2011Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language256 cited
  • 2016Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays220 cited
  • 2024Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement188 cited
  • 2010Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspectives185 cited
  • 2019Corpus approaches to discourse: a critical review177 cited
  • 2016“We must conclude that…”: A diachronic study of academic engagement160 cited
  • 2005Hedging, Inflating, and Persuading in L2 Academic Writing.159 cited
  • 2013Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education135 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students' timed argumentative essays115 cited
  • 2024A real-world test of artificial intelligence infiltration of a university examinations system: A “Turing Test” case study109 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Metadiscursive nouns in academic argument: ChatGPT vs student practices34 cited