SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences
16 references·1 citing·53 second hop
Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences (2025)Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Arti…Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)Publication and collaboration…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)The fight against fake-paper …Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Journal citation reports and …Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Digital magic, or the dark ar…Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)Introduction to systematic re…Catalogue of bias: publication bias (2018)Catalogue of bias: publicatio…How to do a systematic review (2017)How to do a systematic reviewResearch Techniques Made Simple: Assessing Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (2016)Research Techniques Made Simp…Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Searching for grey literature…THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAG…Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome? (2012)Publication bias: What are th…Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice (2012)Narrative approaches to syste…Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias (2005)Systematic review of publicat…Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes (2003)Systematic reviews of the eff…A guide to systematic reviews (2002)A guide to systematic reviewsQuantifying new threats to health and biomedical literature integrity from rapidly scaled publications and problematic research (2026)Quantifying new threats to he…Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies (2021)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (1994)Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2003)Qualitative research: Methods in the social sciences (2006)How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit (2012)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Publication bias - Importance of studies with negative results! (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2019)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. (2016)A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies (2020)A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm (2020)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities (2013)Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories (2014)Adoption and Outcomes of ISO 14001: A Systematic Review (2017)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Trends in the Quality of Care and Racial Disparities in Medicare Managed Care (2005)Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma (2013)Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental health-related stigma and discrimination in the medium and long term: Systematic review (2015)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)From decarbonization to low carbon development and transition: A systematic literature review of the conceptualization of moving toward net-zero carbon dioxide emission (1995–2019) (2020)Post-migration factors and mental health outcomes in asylum-seeking and refugee populations: a systematic review (2020)A systematic literature review on the factors influencing e-commerce adoption in developing countries (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Experiences of transgender and non-binary youth accessing gender-affirming care: A systematic review and meta-ethnography (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Inclusion in practice: a systematic review of diversity-focused STEM programming in the United States (2023)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review (2022)The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis (2023)Meta-analysis accelerator: a comprehensive tool for statistical data conversion in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2012THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES1,256 cited
  • 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits814 cited
  • 2018Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis633 cited
  • 2012Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice589 cited
  • 2017How to do a systematic review536 cited
  • 2012Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome?381 cited
  • 2016Research Techniques Made Simple: Assessing Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews315 cited
  • 2003Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes292 cited
  • 2002A guide to systematic reviews260 cited
  • 2021The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science251 cited
  • 2018Catalogue of bias: publication bias228 cited
  • 2021Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)172 cited
  • 2005Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias153 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?133 cited
  • 2023Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill101 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2026Quantifying new threats to health and biomedical literature integrity from rapidly scaled publications and problematic research21 cited