SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reply to Neveu and Neveu: Inference in an information-restricted environment
9 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Reply to Neveu and Neveu: Inference in an information-restricted environment (2025)Reply to Neveu and Neveu: Inference in an…The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)The entities enabling scienti…Reputation shortcoming in academic publishing (2025)Reputation shortcoming in aca…The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The strain on scientific publ…The review mills, not just (self-)plagiarism in review reports, but a step further (2024)The review mills, not just (s…Paper trail (2024)Paper trailPublication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)Publication and collaboration…Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)Exploratory analysis of text …Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work (2020)Innovating editorial practice…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)Ethnography: Principles and Practice (1983)The Ethnography of Infrastructure (1999)Toward a Theory of Social Practices (2002)The Chinese scientific publication system: Specific features, specific challenges (2020)A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)Enhancing peer review efficiency: A mixed‐methods analysis of artificial intelligence ‐assisted reviewer selection across academic disciplines (2024)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Paraphrasing tools, language translation tools and plagiarism: an exploratory study (2018)Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology (2023)Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines (2024)An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing (2012)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)Paper mill challenges: past, present, and future (2024)Journal of Global Health’s Guidelines for Reporting Analyses of Big Data Repositories Open to the Public (GRABDROP): preventing ‘paper mills’, duplicate publications, misuse of statistical inference, and inappropriate use of artificial intelligence (2025)Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)‘As of my last knowledge update’: How is content generated by ChatGPT infiltrating scientific papers published in premier journals? (2024)Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies (2024)Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance (2024)Open science and transparency are our strongest tools in the fight against fraudulent publishing activities (2025)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The forced battle between peer-review and scientometric research assessment: Why the CoARA initiative is unsound (2024)The peer-review crisis: how to fix an overloaded system (2025)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The Matthew effect in science funding (2018)Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (2000)The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior (2003)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Dramatic increases in redundant publications in the Generative AI era (2025)Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration (2025)Science map of academic misconduct (2024)Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study (2025)Machine learning based screening of potential paper mill publications in cancer research: methodological and cross sectional study (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,282 cited
  • 2024The strain on scientific publishing481 cited
  • 2025The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly128 cited
  • 2023Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill101 cited
  • 2020Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work47 cited
  • 2022Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills43 cited
  • 2024The review mills, not just (self-)plagiarism in review reports, but a step further37 cited
  • 2024Paper trail35 cited
  • 2025Reputation shortcoming in academic publishing5 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work