SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How Do We Keep the Living Laboratory Alive? Learning and Conflicts in Living Lab Collaboration
0 references·16 citing·52 second hop
How Do We Keep the Living Laboratory Alive? Learning and Conflicts in Living Lab Collaboration (2013)How Do We Keep the Living Laboratory Aliv…Living Labs in science-industry collaborations: Roles, design, and application patterns (2024)Living Labs in science-indust…Lost in a haze or playing to partners’ strengths? Learning to collaborate in three transdisciplinary European Living Labs (2023)Lost in a haze or playing to …Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review (2023)Innovation labs as organisati…Living Labs: From Niche to Mainstream Innovation Management (2021)Living Labs: From Niche to Ma…Ideologies in Energy Transition: Community Discourses on Renewables A Review of Living Lab Research Development and Methods for User Involvement (2021)Ideologies in Energy Transiti…Facing Societal Challenges in Living Labs: Towards a Conceptual Framework to Facilitate Transdisciplinary Collaborations (2021)Facing Societal Challenges in…A Systematic Literature Review of Partnership Development at the University–Industry–Government Nexus (2021)A Systematic Literature Revie…Towards a Reflexive Framework for Fostering Co—Learning and Improvement of Transdisciplinary Collaboration (2019)Towards a Reflexive Framework…Applying an RRI Filter in Key Learning on Urban Living Labs’ Performance (2019)Applying an RRI Filter in Key…Understanding the accelerator from resources-based perspective (2018)Understanding the accelerator…The entrepreneurial ecosystem and born globals: the Estonian context (2018)The entrepreneurial ecosystem…A Systematic Review of Living Lab Literature (2018)A Systematic Review of Living…A relational view of start-up firms inside an incubator: the case of the ARCA consortium (2018)A relational view of start-up…Reflecting on Actions in Living Lab Research (2017)Reflecting on Actions in Livi…If Living Labs are the Answer – What's the Question? A Review of the Literature (2017)If Living Labs are the Answer…What difference does a living lab make? Comparing two health technology innovation projects (2014)What difference does a living…The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Public Value Co-Creation in Living Labs—Results from Three Case Studies (2021)The promise of living labs to the Quadruple Helix stakeholders: exploring the sources of (dis)satisfaction (2021)An Introduction to Qualitative Research (2023)Enablers, barriers, and future considerations for living lab effectiveness in environmental and agricultural sustainability transitions: a review of studies evaluating living labs (2023)The Fifth Discipline (1990)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Sustainable development goals: a framework for deploying indicators for higher education institutions (2021)Urban Living Lab: An Experimental Co-Production Tool to Foster the Circular Economy (2022)The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research (2000)The Theory of Economic Development (2003)Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance (2007)Designing the framework of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem: A grounded theory approach in the context of Iran (2020)The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystems and global value chains: Insights from the cultivated meat entrepreneurial ecosystem of Singapore (2022)Training, corporate culture and organizational work models for the development of corporate entrepreneurship in SMEs (2022)The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited (1983)Competing paradigms in qualitative research. (1994)Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation (2009)Polychronic knowledge creation in cross-border business models: a sea-like heuristic metaphor (2020)Digital platforms and international performance of Italian SMEs: an exploitation-based overview (2022)Network embeddedness and manufacturing SMEs’ green innovation performance: the moderating role of resource orchestration capability (2024)A resource‐based view of the firm (1984)The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 (2001)Human Abilities: Emotional Intelligence (2007)An Updated Systematic Review of Business Accelerators: Functions, Operation, and Gaps in the Existing Literature (2022)A framework of accelerator design: harmonizing fragmented knowledge (2023)Advice seeking and mentors’ influence on entrepreneurs’ role identity and business-model change (2024)Science for the post-normal age (1993)Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation (2004)Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges (2007)A Scoping Review Examining Governance, Co-Creation, and Social and Ecological Justice in Living Labs Literature (2021)Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations (2022)Using the right words or using the words right? Re-conceptualising living labs for systemic innovation in socio-ecological systems (2023)A Ladder Of Citizen Participation (1969)Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems (2000)Effects of transdisciplinary research on scientific knowledge and reflexivity (2023)Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach (2025)Co-creation and the new landscapes of design (2008)Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges (2012)Thematic analysis (2016)Living Labs Past Achievements, Current Developments, and Future Trajectories (2021)Temporality, temporariness and keystone actor capabilities in innovation ecosystems (2022)Building Theories from Case Study Research (1989)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)How open is innovation? (2010)Impacts of urban living lab (ULL) on learning to design inclusive, sustainable, and climate-resilient urban environments (2022)The influence of transformational leadership on organizational sustainability in the context of industry 4.0: Mediating role of innovative performance (2022)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2014What difference does a living lab make? Comparing two health technology innovation projects62 cited
  • 2021Facing Societal Challenges in Living Labs: Towards a Conceptual Framework to Facilitate Transdisciplinary Collaborations59 cited
  • 2023Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review59 cited
  • 2021Living Labs: From Niche to Mainstream Innovation Management57 cited
  • 2018Understanding the accelerator from resources-based perspective43 cited
  • 2019Applying an RRI Filter in Key Learning on Urban Living Labs’ Performance40 cited
  • 2017If Living Labs are the Answer – What's the Question? A Review of the Literature39 cited
  • 2018A relational view of start-up firms inside an incubator: the case of the ARCA consortium39 cited
  • 2019Towards a Reflexive Framework for Fostering Co—Learning and Improvement of Transdisciplinary Collaboration38 cited
  • 2018The entrepreneurial ecosystem and born globals: the Estonian context37 cited
  • 2017Reflecting on Actions in Living Lab Research37 cited
  • 2024Living Labs in science-industry collaborations: Roles, design, and application patterns30 cited
  • 2021A Systematic Literature Review of Partnership Development at the University–Industry–Government Nexus30 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Ideologies in Energy Transition: Community Discourses on Renewables A Review of Living Lab Research Development and Methods for User Involvement27 cited
  • 2023Lost in a haze or playing to partners’ strengths? Learning to collaborate in three transdisciplinary European Living Labs24 cited
  • 2018A Systematic Review of Living Lab Literature24 cited