No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Content-based instruction (CBI) is not a new term for foreign language teachers. By some accounts, CBI has been employed since the ancient Akkadians adopted Sumerian as the medium of instruction to educate their young in science and religion (Mehisto, Frigols, and Marsh 2008, 9). In the modern era, content-based approaches to language instruction have been employed in various forms since at least the 1960s, when Canadian language educators began teaching academic content in French to English mother-tongue children (Stoller 2008). Yet a large proportion of today’s teachers of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) have never had the opportunity to try out CBI in their own classrooms—and many of these teachers may lack key professional knowledge and skills that are critical to successful CBI teaching. At the same time, CBI approaches are playing an increasingly prominent role in institutional, national, and regional foreign language curricula, as for example in various Content and Language Integrating Learning (CLIL) projects that are being implemented in Europe (Fernandez Fontecha 2009; Lorenzo, Casal, and Moore 2009; Naves 2009; Seikkula-Leino 2007; Serra 2007). The purpose of this article is to consider ways that language-teacher education programs can better prepare future CBI teachers. After providing a brief rationale for why CBI approaches are particularly relevant in the 21st century, I will consider the competencies and skills that the language teachers of tomorrow will need to effectively integrate content and language instruction in their courses.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.