Science and the Arts in the Renaissance

Abstract

viewed as the narrative frame within which Shakespeare weaves a number of tales "of resistance and discord," the most problematical being the mechanicals' parody of Pyramus and Thisby,' a "counter-model" of "the reconciliation and accom- modation" (p.172) proposed by the play's typical comic conclusion.Similarly, Shakespeare's utilization in Hamlet of the festive ritual of "charivari" or " 'mirth in funerals'" (p.161) reveals how the elements of clowning and "grotesque laughter" resist the reconciliation of "the unfathomable contradictions of political succes- sion" (p.193).Bristol's claim, on the other hand, for the popular "agon or Battle of Carnival and Lent" (p.161) as a dominant rhetorical structure in King Lear -htdiv, the "Carnival king," is replaced by "Lenten severity" which fails to bring about harmonious rule (pp.21 1-12) -is disappointingly cursory.The analysis of the Battle of Carnival and Lent in Henry IV, Parts I and II is the least engaging, for it does not pursue the full significance of Falstaffs defeat.Falstaff s Camivalesque treatment of "honorable death as a joke" and his exultation in the excesses of the body render him the spokesman for "a plebeian consciousness that maintains itself des- pite sacrifices demanded in the name of the nation-state" (p.183) represented by Prince Hal, the "embodiment of Lenten civil policy" (p.206).Bristol, however, ignores the possibility that Falstaff s public rejection in 2 Henry IV \vcvg>\\QS Shakespeare's negation of Carnival as the voice of historical continuity.Although the problem of authority is not fully accommodated to Shakespeare's complex vision of history, the study is a significant and provocative contribution to revisionist criticism.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 101 citations exist upstream.